Search results

Well, you've done a fine job of summing up the fears of those whose do not have spiritual discernment, as well as restating the position of the Pharisees who believed in the scriptures but didn't know His voice. Terrific.

God raised up His Right Arm. “Ladies and gentlemen: the story you are about to hear is true. Only the names have been changed to protect the innocent.”

:D In simple math, if you consider 66 books of the Bible as representing one person presenting the actual, spiritual truth from God...the best possible would be one person every hundred years +/-. Sounds about right. ;)

I appreciate your sincerity, and it is not wrong to be found in the midst of the times having the knowledge that was for that time. But we go unto all truth. This now is that time. What your explanation shows is that you are stating the chronology as the facts, which they are well enough, but...

Okay. But it's both (or all Three). What I was explaining before, saying that One unpacked is Three, and repacked is One...is just how God has presented Himself over times. It would be like saying "I am the Right Hand of God, and whoever loves the Right Hand will be loved by the whole Being of...

No...the issue is whoever they cast as 007, is James Bond. But we don't have the comprehension to put it together. Stupid is as stupid does.

That is just the Old Testament take on it--not that I disagree. But playing the opposing advocate...it could easily be argued that in the fullness of time the Son came also to be revealed and known. And the same could be said of the Holy Spirit. All of which simply continues the problem of not...

Yeah...kinda like saying you're the Beginning and the End. ...Surely there must be two different doctrines for each!

Yes. And again, it is He who has done both the unpacking and the repacking. I just said it outloud.

Don't get me wrong. I am not for or against the Trinity doctrine. But those things seemingly for and against must be reconciled. And for what reason would anyone consider one group of scriptures more correct than others, if not for lack of understanding?

And so begins the ages old argument once again. Nonetheless, what I have said is the truth. Jesus even started the repacking, saying, "I and the Father are One." ...Which is only right, seeing how it was the Father that started the unpacking, saying, "This is My beloved Son in whom I am well...

People struggle with their individuality. In fact, so much so that this issue is a prideful argument pretty much unto death. Yes, I said "pride." And God breaking things down into days and weeks and minutes and seconds; and different experiences, and parables, as any good parent does in baby...

Then you all have errored by 1,881 years, for He said, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth." Matthew 28:18 Past tense. He has (past tense) become Lord of Lords and King of Kings. He is on the throne of God, and has been since He went to the Father. Which was not the end...

Yes, by Jesus taking sin upon himself.

This was Pastor Jack Hibbs message today - It's quite good:

:cool: You two got this! Excellent!

"Spirit-speak" -- thanks for the compliment!

This world is that prison to which Jesus came to set the captives free, saying also, "And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also" John 14:3 In other words...this is not that placed--not if you are changed, not if...

This too is written: Luke 21:24 And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled. Romans 11:25 For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this...

No...and that is not biblical. Biblically, the first and the last used by Jesus to outline and give understanding about the resurrection is best summarized by Paul, saying "to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile" Romans 2:10. Which is even a foreshadowing of the greater spiritual truth of...