Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Red Herring. I never said "being spiritually dead" is extra-biblical. I said the idea of dying spiritually is extra-biblical. Spiritual life is eternal life.
  2. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I believe we were dead in our trespass and sins. And I believe this points to being spiritually dead. But I do not believe men are spiritually alive, spiritually due when we sin, and need to be made spiritually alive again. This includes Adam.
  3. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I believe spiritual life is Christ. I think this is why Paul speaks of "not I but Christ in me". What I believe is that Adam was created with the need of a Savior, that need not realized or expressed until he transgressed God's command. The transgression demonstrated Adam as having a human...
  4. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I also believe Adam was created "good", and "upright". But I also believe Adam was created with a standing that was less than God. I believe we are born the same. Do you believe Adam was created with spiritual life and when he sinned he died spiritually?
  5. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I am sticking with Scripture. The Bible never speaks of anyone dying a spiritual death. Not Adam. Not Jesus. Not the lost. No one. The concept itself is extra-biblical. I have no interest in your "old wives tales", superstitions, and myths. The best evidence against Penal Substitution Theory is...
  6. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Because there is no evidence in Scripture thus death was spiritual. That and Scripture describes the Judgment as Christ-centered (something Penal Substitution Theory rejects). Scripture does not even state that those who suffer the "second death" are made spiritually so they can die...
  7. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    suffering, pain, or loss that serves as retribution b: a penalty inflicted on an offender through judicial procedure Your idea the Cross was retribution is wrong. The idea it was a penalty influcted through a judicial procedure is wrong.
  8. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    We actually do not know that Adam was not destined to die. That line of thinking is like believing Adam was created asexual as this was before God determined to create woman as a helper. I believe Adam was created as we are. He was created short of God's standard. This became evident when he...
  9. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I guess in a way you could say my friend was representing his country. Regardless, Jesus did not suffer and die instead of us but for us. That is the language Scripture uses (not "instead" but "for"). The difference is the distinction between "substitute" and "because".
  10. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    He was suffering the consequences of sin, the "penalty" of being human. Not a punishment. A penalty is a "disadvantage, loss, or hardship due to some action". The origin of "penalty" is "pain". It does not mean punishment.
  11. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Generally when I refer to being under a "curse" what I mean is under the bondage of sin and death.
  12. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    LOL.... No. His life for us (not instead of us). A "purchase" or "redemption". I had a friend who was killed in Bosnia. He died for his country, not instead of his country.
  13. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Peter's sermon in Acts 2 says that those men put Christ to death. It is true that Jesus lay down His life, but this was not suicide.
  14. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    When I was typing that response I was thinking of Galatians 3:13; Romans 5:12-21; and Romans 8:18.
  15. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    The few that I have seen (actually, this was when I held the Theory) claimed that Penal Substitution Theory was a flawed philosophy and projected this on Scripture. Those who left Penal Substitution Theory in favor of turning either "to Scripture" or adopting at least one position within the...
  16. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    No problem. It required His blood to purchase because this is the curse mankind was under. The wages of sin is death.
  17. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Hey Marks, What I hold is the "classic view", and others have articulated it much more better :D than I. The ECF's did disagree, but at the same time there was a common idea of the atonement throughout all of their individual theories. That said, "redeemed" means that we were purchased. We...
  18. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    No one took the lives of many martyr's away except that they lay down their lives for Christ. Many died voluntarily in obedience to God. The issue is Penal Substitution Theory does not necessitate Christ's physical death and suffering at all. It necessitates only what it thinks is associated...
  19. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    What verse are you referencing that speaks of men dying spiritually? Do you believe that the punishment for sin includes physical death?
  20. John Caldwell

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I never try to change people's understanding or view. I do, however, try to direct people to Scripture. I am pretty much anti-Penal Substitution Theory, through. The reason is that I have seen it cause damage in the lives of people. I've seen it cause people to stumble as they see...