Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    He didn't blow anything. The anointing (consecration) of Christ simply wasn't the anointing prophesied. That won't come until after Armageddon.
  2. Trekson

    Maybe I Am Not Understanding the Post Tribulation Rapture. - Can You Help?

    I was thinking of the latter part of Rev. 14. The sheep and goat judgment is after Armageddon.
  3. Trekson

    Maybe I Am Not Understanding the Post Tribulation Rapture. - Can You Help?

    I believe Rev. 14 to be a secondary picture of the rapture. One has to look at the end of the 70th week from the perspective of the three fall feasts that will be fulfilled throughout the latter half. The 144, 000 are gathered first, the next batch will be those of Rev. 12:14 and the last will...
  4. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    There is no biblical verification for what you believe and the bible doesn't say anything about what you believe Messiah accomplished via this prophecy. You are adding all that. The text has the last week separated from the other 69. That's noy my opinion, that is how it is written. So, you see...
  5. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    You are saying he came at birth, but that's not what the prophecy is saying. He came as Messiah when the triumphal entry occurred, not anytime before. If you want to believe that Christ was crucified in the middle of the 70th week, then one has to believe that all prophecies concerning Christ...
  6. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    I agree, but apparently none of you believe that you are infallible, just that I am. Should I just ignore what I was shown because folks will disagree w/ me? I can't do that. I am trying to clarify the confusion about what Dan. 9:24-27 actually say. Yes, it is up to the folks that read whether...
  7. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The bible doesn't say 'after" it says "unto", meaning he will come in the 69th week and he is cut off a second or two the sunset of the next day which fulfills the prophecy as stated. When Christ came as prophesied was when Zech. 9:9 was fulfilled. "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O...
  8. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Then why does God use men at all? Why didn't God give the same anointing to David than was done for Christ? It's not about what kind of anointing is greater it's about fulfilling the prophecy to the letter, not substituting for something that is close enough or seems to be better. God gives...
  9. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    I don't need to explain why. Why are you listening to folks who were way less informed about prophecy then we are. Don't you believe Dan. 12:4. "But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased."...
  10. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Sorry, but that anointing is "not" the same as the anointing spoken of in vs. 24. Was Christ consecrated and one of the NT def. of the word "anointed" includes that? Yes, but vs. 24 is about being anointed as King like Saul, David and other kings were and this will be done at the beginning of...
  11. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Laugh if you will, but it's never been talking about God's anointing. Get a dictionary and a Strong's and learn how to read before you start criticizing folks about words which you apparently don't understand.
  12. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    I don't listen to other peoples opinions on what I should think and believe, that is what the HS is for. It's the verse itself that tells you, if you don't understand what the OP plainly shows, I can't help you. But when it is actually fulfilled, Christ will do a much better job then you think...
  13. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    You're adding to scripture something it doesn't say. He arrives via prophecy and dies via prophecy for a period of two-three days, that's not an opinion, that is what Dan. 9:26-27 shows and the first topic is a completely false rendering of what it says and you should be ashamed of yourself. If...
  14. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The apocalypse is real, it's the word "literature" that detracts if from being the authorized word of God. Yes, some symbolism is used and if one is a student of the bible, there not hard to figure out or the text explains them. But if one tries to symbolize let's say, the trumpet or vial...
  15. Trekson

    Maybe I Am Not Understanding the Post Tribulation Rapture. - Can You Help?

    No, they aren't the same. The whole concept of a seven year trib period is false from the onset. The bible never describes it that way. But the seven year are the unfulfilled 70th week from Dan. 9:24-27. Matt. 24:29-31 depicts the rapture, imo, and Rev. 19 is the only NT passage that gives us a...
  16. Trekson

    Rapture Thoughts of Some Early Church Leaders

    It wasn't just in America.
  17. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Nope, still not the correct use of the word anointed to match vs. 24. He was the one anointed (consecrated or set aside) to be the one and only perfect sacrifice. When the millennium begins he will be anointed (by the rubbing on of oil) to be King and Messiah of the world. Just as Saul, David...
  18. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Mostly it's historicists who believe that because otherwise their theology falls flat. I believe it was you who made the comment about the nations of Dan. 2 and Dan. 7 were "all" fulfilled in the linear prophetic time but that's not true either as the 5th kingdom of Dan. 2 and the 4th kingdom of...
  19. Trekson

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Dan. 9:25-26a gives info about his arrival and his crucifixion which was prophetically fulfilled in a span of 2-3 days. That's it! Nothing else is Messiah related. The info was given as timeline indicators but it seems most folks miss that.