Search results

Yeah, and, accordingly, Paul says the Gentile believers, who neither possess (Ro 2:14) nor know the Law (Ro 7:1), qualify as "doers of the Law" (Ro 2:13, 14, 26, 27)--even without observing the days the Jews observe (Ro 14:5, 6).

Because he was humble enough to want to verify it, because he got it by private revelation, not from men. Because Jesus already said He was sending Paul to the nations (Acts 9:15). It does not follow from "Paul says 'my Gospel'" that he is saying "My Gospel is different than Peter's"--that's a...

@Doug Matthew 16:18“I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church According to you, those who hear and believe "Peter's Gospel" become part of "the remnant of Israel", which you say is Christ's bride, whereas those who hear and believe "Paul's Gospel" become...

Again, the IC, which, in part, rests upon the foundation of Mary as the New Eve, is a doctrine declared ex-cathedra.

Waiting for your responses.

"Faith" is simply believing what God says, what ever the message is. Abraham, for example, believed God that his descendants would be numerous as the stars (Gn 15:5,6). The Gospel was a mystery in the ages past (Ro 16:25). Today, however, there is one faith--because there is one Gospel, one...

The claim of infallibility is a a very big claim, and it, apparently, rests on provably shaky ground.

Yeah, if a Gentile JOINS Israel, the Torah says "there shall be one Law for the native born and the sojourner", so there wouldn't be an issue with Peter going to one of THEIR homes, but Cornelius WASN'T one of them, which was exactly why the Jews who went with Peter were ASTONISHED that...

Not at all. Faith comes by hearing the Word of God, and there is only one faith, so there is only one message to put faith in. The "not at all" belongs to your unsubstantiable claim about there being more than one Gospel. You have many challenges to overcome to prove your claim, and you have...

Meaning, how ever you want to view it is how you are going to view it--anyone who wants to discuss how it affects the claim to infallibility can discuss it with me.

This passage goes into detail on how Abraham is father of many nations (Gentiles). Romans 4: 9Is this blessing then on the circumcised, or on the uncircumcised also? For we say, “FAITH WAS CREDITED TO ABRAHAM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS.” 10How then was it credited? While he was circumcised, or...

Either way--how ever it does or does not affect "Catholicism"--the entire idea of Mary as New Eve is an error.

Nope, she is stubbornly refusing to admit a very basic truth, which is unadulterated dishonesty, which demonstrates her commitment to dodging truth in all cases, so I'm not going to argue with a donkey.

When Peter says Christ was raised to sit on David's throne, he's just talking about how Jesus is the Messiah LOL not differing with Paul. Both Paul and Peter identify Christ is the Messiah--and that's good, since Apostle John says if you deny that fact you are antichrist. Both Paul and Peter...

There are so many death knells to his folly.

Being forgiven of your sins (as Peter says) is one and the same with being justified (as Paul says), because Paul defines "the righteousness of faith" (that results in justification) as BEING FORGIVEN (Ro 4:6-8). Romans 4 5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the...

For thousands of years, men have devoted their entire lives to studying Scripture, attempting to answer its difficult questions, differing with others on its meaning and debating one another on its meaning, but you say "it's simple"! I'm not interested in speaking with a person who is so foolish...

I don't even understand how it could be hyper-Pauline to deny what Paul writes--mocking the idea that a man's wife is his own body, because they two become one flesh... anyway!

You can "say" what you like, and I will "say" what I like--the dogma of IC relies in part upon her having been as Eve, thus she was to have been sinless, just as Eve, yet she obeyed instead of disobeying--nice discussing with you.

Right, but if the Bible were simple, you ought not to have been confused at all--that's the point. Anyway, I'm not going to argue with a woman, because you are the weaker vessels (mentally), so you will never admit the truth of your folly (claiming the Bible is simple).