Search results

What an argument. Maybe one would also foolishly think Jesus was in the heart of the earth for 3 thousand years rather than 3 literal days, for example. As if creation days have to also equal 1k years each if one takes 2 Peter 3:8 in the literal sense. Creation days involved 24 hour days. They...

Revelation 2:26 And he that overcometh and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: What 'end' do you assume is being meant here? It seems to me that one is not rewarded with power over the nations until they have first overcome and kept His works until the end...

Why do some assume the worst about me at times, as if I have no brain in my head? As if I can't see any of these things myself? This is not the 80s anymore. In the 80s I was indeed naive about a lot of things. But that was then, this is now. Not the way I see it based on what I already...

Chatgpt as my Bible teacher? Where was Chatgpt 5 years ago? 10 years ago? 20 years ago? If I didn't need it as Bible teacher back then why would I need it as one now? Chatgpt has never changed my mind about anything I already believe and have concluded way before there was such a thing as...

What is wrong with some of you ppl some of the time? Why are you lying about what I'm arguing? And why are others liking the fact that you are lying about what I'm arguing? I'm not arguing that born again Jews equal enemies. Therefore, quit lying about what I'm arguing.

Up until they die, assuming some of them chose to believe before they died, why doesn't that equal they were still beloved in the meantime? While on the OTOH, those that remain in disbelief up until death, they are no longer beloved at that point. IOW, in this case, being beloved for the...

Let's not forget, that this is posted at the bottom of every chat encounter with Chatgpt---ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info. So it's not like some of us think Chatgpt can never be wrong about anything. Yet at the same time, it is absurd to think Chatgpt is wrong about everything...

Except what you are arguing in regards to verse 28 is not what I'm arguing. I'm not arguing two different groups are meant in both clauses. I'm arguing that only one group is meant in both clauses. Therefore, I couldn't possibly be arguing that born again Jews are enemies. Therefore, you are...

I have to admit, though this post obviously implies Amil, at least your version anyway, it makes good sense over all.

Exactly. And that's been my reasoning all along. Only someone with doctrinal bias' would treat it differently. Why do some interpreters apparently do not want unbelieving Jews to still be beloved so that they too can be saved? It's not like once they are cutoff, there are no more chances for...

There are numerous arguments why the Premil reading has to be correct, theologically speaking. Such as. Matthew 19:28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit...

Romans 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. As concerning the gospel, enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, beloved for the fathers' sakes How can when read in this manner that...

You imagine wrong. When I initially found out about Chatgpt, guess what? At the time it didn't even cross my mind that Chatgpt might be useful for Biblical subjects. But then eventually for some reason, I then decided to ask it about Biblical subjects. Initially I was using Chatgpt to build...

In this initial post that you are quoting here, that was all my position, 100%. I only used Chatgpt to polish it up for me some. First I submitted my view, then I used Chatgpt to rephrase it for me some. As a writing tool, so to speak. Even @Spiritual Israelite has been on record and said he...

Pretty much everything I believe and have concluded, has been my positions for decades now, yet Chatgpt is somehow my source for truth even though there was no such thing as Chatgpt decades ago? And that makes sense exactly how?

In this case it was your tone that I was taking issue with. You came across as pretty hostile towards me.

For all I know, you and I likely agree about everything else in Romans 11. I'm only disputing your interpretation of verse 28. Just because the unbelieving Jews are beloved for the fathers' sakes, my understanding of that verse, all I see that meaning is, the fact they can still be grafted back...

What does this mean exactly? If it has something to do with ChatGPT's opinions on these subjects, what does that have to do with me? Not one single time have I conversed with Chatgpt in regards to these subjects nor am I planning on it in the future.

Whatever.

Guess what? For anyone who might be interested. Before Chatgpt was a thing, for decades now, how I interpret and understand Romans 11:28 has never changed. I can read what the verse says. I can comprehend what it means. Even decades ago I already had enough sense to realize that both 'they's in...