Search results

Sorry, but it's because the editors know the criticism doesn't amount to anything, else they'd have published it. Can I ask you two things? Why do you believe data anyone can publish on the internet that's not peer-reviewed is superior to Gentry's data that's published on top-tier...

The issue isn't identifying an age gauge, but whether granite instantly formed according to the Bible or took millions of years, according to evolution.

Gentry published his findings on many top tier, elite, peer-reviewed science journals and challenged all scientists of the world to a top tier, elite, peer-reviewed, science journal open debate before the entire world. Baillieul published his "Polonium Haloes Refuted" article on the internet...

I think you missed something in the OP - please re-read the part about Dr. Gentry discovered.

The reason you don't agree that parent Po218 radioisotope halos disprove evolution and prove instantaneous formation of the Earth's granite rocks is that you don't fully understand the topic. It's OK. It's a very heavy subject and only those with both a willingness to remain objective and the...

Thank you. Hopefully, now you see that the only thing modern Futurism has in common with what the ECFs believed is that an Antichrist would at some point arise in the future. They knew there was more to the phrase "man of sin" than just a single man, seeing that they believed the same was...

My friend, MODERN FUTURISM IS JESUIT FUTURISM! Jesuit Futurism denies prophetic fulfillment parallels history - NOT THE ECFs. Jesuit Futurism says prophetic fulfillment suspends at the end of Revelation 3 - NOT THE ECFs. Jesuit Futurism says prophetic fulfillment resumes following a...

You tryna say "debunk"? Cause that's what Protestant Historicism does to Jesuit Futurism

**** Note **** (If you wish to skip the boring science lesson and head down to the bottom to find out about the "50 years of deafening silence" - be my guest) Dr. Robert Gentry, a Seventh-day Adventist scientist, made an extremely important discovery many years ago. After much research, in 1976...

How many "nice" atheist professors, scientists, academics have helped shepherd countless victims to a Christless grave by convincing them there's no God and, thus, no need of a Savior? How many confused, vulnerable young people commit suicide because they've been taught life is meaningless...

Holy smoke! A died in the wool Jesuit Futurist who doesn't know a thing about Protestant Historicism, and yet insists that Protestant Historicism is false! No way! Seriously, friend, would you like to go through the prophecies and discover why Historicism is fact and Jesuit Futurism, like...

I don't remember what you said a year ago, but I do know you recently said the ECFs believed Rome was the Antichrist. Yes, Rome was the fourth beast which fell into ten barbarian divisions (ten horns) and among them "came up another Little Horn" - the Papal Antichrist. Believing a future...

I already told you several times...why do you want to make me keep repeating myself? You said the ECFs thought the Roman Empire was the Antichrist. I corrected you by showing they taught the Roman Empire was the Restrainer. Then, I directed you to this link --...

I don't recall demanding you read anything...you're free to do so or not. However, I will NOT engage in a debate with someone who refuses to do so from a historically accurate position. Therefore, when you gain a such a proper position, let me know and I'm happy to continue the discussion. My...

I see no hypocrisy. I have good reason to disregard your post (contains erroneous facts of history) while you have no reason to ignore my link (opportunity to correct your erroneous facts of history). I was debating Truth7t7 about whether the whore of Revelation 17 was the Papacy or Jerusalem...

Sorry, but I didn't read it at all, as I indicated in my last post. As soon as I read what you wrote - namely, that the ECFs thought the Roman Empire was the Antichrist - I stopped reading. If you've read the link to the excerpts of H. Grattan Guinness's "Romanism and the Reformation", you'll...

Randy, my friend who claims to have "heard it all before", I gave you an excellent link which details by evidence testimony what the ECFs believed and you've clearly chosen to ignore it, preferring to rely on the incorrect knowledge you've gained. THE ECFS DID NOT THINK THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS THE...

Jesuits formulated both Futurism and Preterism. The Historicists have it right. Every point of "proof" text offered to me over the years to support either Jesuit Futurism or Jesuit Preterism I've shown to actually support Historicism. How do you feel about this quote from them? "Then the...

What matters is who agrees with Scripture. You said "will rule" which is future tense. The Bible and I say, "Reigneth" which is present tense. Are you not concerned that "reigneth" totally disqualifies Jerusalem and absolutely qualifies Rome as the city of the whore?

No. Nothing wrong with that. God, one inspired writer says, allows the spirit of deception to remain in the midst of the church (tares and wheat) so that we never forget our great need for His protection and continued prayer for Holy Spirit discernment. Let's examine that - is it possible to...