Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    That's your straw man fallacy.
  2. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    I have heard your kind of answers over and over through many years of my Christian life. It has nothing to do with not liking your answers. It has everything to do with your inability to stop using logical fallacies. When will you get it?
  3. OzSpen

    Duplicating back quotes

    Over the last few weeks I have been having problems with back quoting a post. That post is automatically duplicated so it means I have to delete one of the duplicates and get that unnecessary editing smudge at the bottom of my post. Some malfunction seems to have been generated with the...
  4. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    Richard, I find your comment somewhat confusing as well. After people become Christians and commit sins, do they need to confess those sins to God, repent and seek His forgiveness? Or is there no need to do this? Oz
  5. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    Here you go again with another red herring. In this reply, you did not address what I wrote in #46, with the evidence I provided to demonstrate the context of Rom 9:14-16 deals with Israel, both before and after those verses. But justaname doesn't want to deal with this context for Rom 9:14-16...
  6. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    In #42 you did not deal with the issue I had raised in #41 concerning Acts 2:23. But you were off an running with your own agenda from Rom 9. As for 1 Peter 1:1-2 and 1 Peter 1:20 you did not deal with them at all in #42. So you dished up to me a red herring fallacy. We cannot have a rational...
  7. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    What were the specifics I addressed in #41? What were the specifics of your reply to me in #42? You avoided my specifics from #41. This happens over and over on this forum and you are not the only one who engages in the use of red herring logical fallacies. But you did it in #42. Oz
  8. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    justaname, I find that to be terrible contextual exegesis. Read the verses that precede Rom 9:14-16, i.e. Rom 9:1-3, 4-5, 6-13 and you'll find that Rom 9:14-16 is not referring to Christians but to Israel. That is especially obvious in the verses you quoted, esp. Rom 9:15, 'For he says to...
  9. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    justaname, I do not know what motivates you to do this. You did not address the issues I raised. I effectively wasted my time examining what I did in #41. You have dished up a red herring logical fallacy. We cannot have a logical discussion when you refuse to deal with the issues I raise. If...
  10. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    justaname, 1 Peter 1:1-2 (ESV) states, How does this apply to Acts 2:23 (ESV), 'this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men'? If what you are saying is correct, there was no need for Acts 2:23 (ESV) to...
  11. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    justaname, I most certainly did not miss a second definition of the noun, πρόγνωσις. The only things I left out were references to classical sources and sources in Josephus, the Apocrypha and the church fathers. I would not be so dishonest as to leave out a second definition. That second...
  12. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    Mine is the view of: Arndt, W F & Gingrich, F W 1957. A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (limited edition licensed to Zondervan Publishing House). This is the 4th rev & enlarged edition and my reply is...
  13. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    justaname, The answer to my question lies in the meaning of: ἐκλεκτος (1 Peter 1:1), AND πρόγνωσις (1 Peter 1:2) According to Bauer, Arndt & Gingrich (1957:710), πρόγνωσις means 'foreknowledge ... receive exact foreknowledge ... Of God's omniscient wisdom and intention ... according to the...
  14. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    Please provide links to the posts to which you refer. You shouldn't expect anyone 'to read the posts' when you don't provide a link to the ones you want us to read.
  15. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    This is another straw man argument. I do not support OSAS, but instead perseverance of the saints, and I do NOT support or push for works needed for salvation. If you are going to accuse people on this forum who do not support OSAS of believing in works salvation, then please quote them, along...
  16. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    Sorry FH, That's my error. I should have given you the first two verses, I Peter 1:1-2 (ESV) which read: What do these two verses teach about the nature of election/predestination? Oz
  17. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    FH, In my post I gave you this verse in support of predestination/election: 1 Peter 1:1 (ESV) What does this verse teach about predestination/election? Oz
  18. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    Richard, You provide not one piece of evidence to support your claims for these 2 sentences. When you speak about 'those', you need to provide us with proof from 'those' people. Otherwise, what you stated here is out of your mind and as stated by lforrest, it's a strawman logical fallacy...
  19. OzSpen

    Two Ways of thinking about OSAS

    FH, I also believe in predestination/election according to 1 Peter 1:1 (ESV) but I do not believe in OSAS. Instead, I consider that the Bible teaches perseverance of the saints (John 3:36 ESV; John 5:24 ESV). Oz
  20. OzSpen

    Common ground

    Samael, From where did you obtain that information that makes you so certain of your position? Oz