Search results

Why would you assume that when the text is contained within the most highly symbolic book in the entire Bible? The two witnesses are said to be "two olive trees" and "two candlesticks" (or lampstands). How does that fit the idea of them representing two individuals? In Revelation 1:20...

So, how do you interpret Hebrews 11:13 which says that the people of faith, which included Enoch, all died? Hebrews 11:5 does not say that Enoch never died. He was taken up at that time so that he didn't die at that time, but Hebrews 11:13 indicates that he must have died later. Why are you not...

Exactly. But, he thinks we're the bad guys just because we expose the flaws in his false beliefs. The problem is not us. The problem is his extreme pride and stubbornness that is reflected in his unwillingness to acknowledge that he is mistaken and needs to adjust his beliefs accordingly.

Why don't you recall that? Do you have a memory problem? I've talked about how I interpret Daniel 9:24-27 many times. How can you not remember? Daniel 9:27 is about the confirming of the new covenant by the blood of Jesus that put an end to the old covenant animal sacrifices and offerings and...

Thank you. But, unfortunately, he almost certainly won't answer it.

And I saw how you treat others, so it was no surprise for you to call me a "clown man". Pal. You can dish it out, but can't take it just like so many others on this forum.

There is more than one definition of the word "flood". It does not have to refer to a literal flood caused by water, if that's what you're thinking. For example, a 911 operator can be said to receive a flood of phone calls after a mass casualty event occurs. The destruction of Jerusalem came...

I'll pray for your wife and his wife, also. I guess I might as well mention that my wife is going through immunotherapy treatments for cancer as well, so I'd appreciate your prayers.

What the prophecy specifically indicates had to be fulfilled by the end of the 70 weeks were the six things listed in Daniel 9:24 and the confirming of the covenant, which we know Jesus did by confirming the new covenant, during the 70th week. That's it. You are reading things into the text that...

Do you think that each day of the last days is 1,000 years in duration? Which would mean that almost 2 of the last days have been completed so far? Peter indicated that the last days refers to the time period during which scoffers scoff at the promise of Christ's second coming (2 Peter 3:3-4)...

Hmmm. Maybe you should make that more clear when you're doing that then. Yes, he does and I agree with that, but I think the vials are parallel also and, for some reason, he doesn't. I see that as him being inconsistent. The book of Revelation is not just a chronological telling of events, so...

Why are you being so stubborn and not acknowledging what is indicated in Hebrews 11:13? Maybe you need it spelled out to you. Hebrews 11:4 By faith Abel offered to God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, through which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts; and...

It's almost impossible to get him to give straightforward answers to straightforward questions. That's what happens when people have something to hide or are unwilling to acknowledge that their beliefs have been refuted.

He contradicts himself constantly. He'll make a blanket statement and say that spirit beings must have physical hosts, but then he acknowledges that angels operate outside of physical hosts (I think). And he won't even address how it's possible that demons can exist after they are cast out of...

There is absolutely nothing that says the destruction of the city and the sanctuary had to occur during the 70 weeks. The destruction of earthly Jerusalem and the temple buildings was a residual effect of the Jews having rejected Christ and His establishment of the new covenant by way of His...

LOL. None of that relates to the point I'm making which is that Satan is a real spirit being who tempted Jesus in the desert. NOTHING you're saying is refuting that. You say that Satan is the spirit of fallen man or mankind. So, what man was there with Jesus in the desert that was talking to...

I have addressed ALL of your arguments MANY times, so don't pretend otherwise. You are the one using diversion tactics to avoid addressing my arguments. But, oh no! I guess I'm personally attacking you by pointing that out.

You lose almost every debate that you're in. No one agrees with your lone wolf Amillennialist-Dispensationalist combo beliefs. What hypocrites you both are. So, we should just ignore your personal attacks?

Thanks. I try to be consistent, so it's nice to have confirmation. Yes, I have seen you act the way you did with me with others as well with your frequent personal insults. How interesting that you have a problem with me treating you the way you treat others. Think about that.

You don't have to disagree by calling the other person's interpretation absurd while telling that they're making nonsense out of it throughout and all that unnecessary nonsense. You say that right after saying you can see the logic in some of their interpretation. Why not just say you disagree...