Search results

Agree. Agree again. Great question. Some of his reasons are....highly questionable.

What evidence are you seeing in scripture to back up the things you're saying? Where does scripture ever speak of 7 thousand years of human history, even implicitly? Nowhere. Yet, that's something you're trying to argue. It doesn't come from scripture. You should be logically deducing things...

Maybe not completely, but no Amill believes in a future earthly reign of Christ for a thousand years. That's something only Premills believe.

You know that Amills don't believe that, right? Were you just talking about Amills referencing what Premills believe about that? It came across as if you were saying that Amills also believe that, so that's why I questioned your statement. Agree. Yes, but I didn't understand why you lumped...

Did you not read everything he said? He was talking about the idea of an eighth day of the week. None of these verses you referenced... ...say anything about an eighth day of the week.

The beginning of a new week is the first day of the new week, not an 8th day of the previous week. LOL. What? You are saying that Sunday is both the 8th day and day 1 of a new week? What is it the 8th day of exactly then? The previous week? Goodness sakes. I really hope at some point you will...

It's amazing to witness what Premils are resorting to in their effort to keep their doctrine afloat. All unbiblical theories like Adam living to 930 years old as being some kind of evidence to support Premill and also this 8th day nonsense. It seems that Premils have given up on trying to use...

There's just one problem with what you're saying here. But, it's a major one. What you're talking about is never taught anywhere in scripture. Nowhere in scripture can you find anything about the days of the week being related to human history. You are just making things up to support your...

Amills don't speak of any future reign, but instead believe that Christ has been reigning since His resurrection, so why did you ask him what future reign he "or the Amills are speaking of"?

Matthew 25:31-46 makes it very clear that the unsaved will be cast "into everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels" when Jesus comes again with His angels and not 1,000+ years later. So, you can say all you want, but you don't have scripture on your side. Jesus also said that the...

But, in your view that the new heavens and new earth will be ushered in at the beginning of the thousand years right after Christ returns, you also have wickedness dwelling on the new earth. Why would Peter say that righteousness dwells in the new earth if wickedness also dwells there? That's...

Do you take this same approach to the entire book of Revelation? When you say "it's about what it says it's about" you mean that it's meant to be taken literally as written. So, with that in mind, make sure you are on the lookout for a literal seven-headed, ten-horned beast and literal...

Why are you not taking 2 Peter 3:8 in context? You are being reckless with scripture. The context of 2 Peter 3:8 is not in relation to the duration of earth's history, but rather in relation to whether or not someone can claim that the Lord is being slow to fulfill the promise of His second...

Show me where scripture itself teaches that there will be 7 thousand years of human history. You Premils make all these claims that are not taught anywhere in scripture. Why? Are you unable to provide any clear scriptures to back up your Premil belief? Why are you always resorting to these...

Of course. I never said otherwise. But, it's still part of scripture and if you're going to try to support Premil, you should not make things up and should support it with clear scripture instead of this 930 year old Adam nonsense.

That is never stated in Genesis anywhere. I can't believe how dishonest you are being about this. Are you that desperate to keep your Premil beliefs afloat? You really need to just stick to the post-trib vs. pre-trib debate. You seem to be in over your head in the Amil vs. Premil debate. How...

You do understand that Hebrews 1:13-14 was written long after the angels would have been originally created, right? That verse is saying all of the angels existing at that time it was written were all ministering spirits. That passage says nothing one way or another about whether or not there...

You seem to have changed your belief about who 2 Peter 2:4 applies to. It seems that instead of claiming that it applies to the ungodly of the days of Noah, as you claimed before, you're now saying it applies to those who lived before that time because you said it applies to "those whom God...

So, it's just too hard for you to answer a simple question which means I can only conclude that you don't actually want to be taken seriously in relation to this topic. Okay then. You should just stick to proving post-trib and refuting pre-trib.

Let me know if you want to share a serious argument about this. I can't take this 930 years stuff seriously. And you won't even answer any of my questions. You say that Adam's life was cut short of 1,000 because of his sin. Does that mean you think he would have lived 1,000 years and then died...