Search results

So, you're calling us wicked for merely having a different interpretation of Revelation 20 than you do. How nice. Would you like to show us where it is taught in scripture that salvation is dependent on whether or not someone believes in amil or premil? I must have missed that. May God have...

We're already in the kingdom of Christ. That's what you premils don't get even though it's explicitly taught in scripture. Colossians 1:12 and giving joyful thanks to the Father, who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of his holy people in the kingdom of light. 13 For he has rescued...

I do. The only other verse besides in Revelation 20 containing the Greek words "protos" (first) and "anastasis" (resurrection) together is this one: Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and...

No one brings doctrinal bias into this more than you do, so that is very ironic for you to say that. That word "zao" does not mean to be made alive or to be resurrected. Look at how it's used in other verses. Always in relation to being alive or living one's life. That is how it is used in...

Apparently, he thinks he's God.

Tell me who here is claiming that the bodily resurrection of the dead in Christ has already occurred.

I allow scripture to tell me what the first resurrection is, but you'd rather change the rest of scripture in favor of your false interpretation of Revelation 20:5-6 instead of letting other scripture help you interpret it. I laugh at your warnings as they mean less than nothing to me. I know...

What a lie from the pit of hell. This could not be more false if you tried. Complete nonsense. Amillennialism absolutely does NOT corrupt the gospel at all. You have nothing but lies to back up your insane claims. We hold the great God and Savior Jesus Christ in much higher regard than premils...

Even more important than Christ's resurrection? Wow. No. The fact of the matter is that Christ's resurrection was first in order, not the resurrection of the dead in Christ. But, do you care about that? No. You'd rather change the rest of scrpiture in favor of your false interpretation of...

LOL. Says the guy who disregards Paul's end times teachings. John 5:28-29 says all people in the graves without distinction. I don't ignore anything. You have no idea of what you're talking about. The dead in Christ will all be resurrected at the same time and not just those who were beheaded...

There is and I've proven it with scripture. Of course, you have no understanding of scripture, so that's why you can't see it. lol Tell me how you interpret this passage: Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7 Nor because...

He's not just talking about Daniel's people. He referenced all who are in the graves. That's all of the dead. As if He would not talk about the resurrection of anyone else but Daniel's people? I can't take you seriously. I'm not wasting any more time on this.

Being part of Spiritual Israel has nothing to do with being part of national Israel. How many times do you need to be told that before you stop acting like I'm saying I'm part of national Israel? You have no reading comprehension skills whatsoever.

I'm seeing this a lot on this forum. People damning others to hell for merely disagreeing with their eschatology. Makes me wonder if these people even understand how someone is saved. Salvation is not based on their eschatological beliefs, that's for sure! But, many here seem to not understand...

I am part of the Israel that Paul says not all national Israel are part (Romans 9:6-8). Deal with it. If you ever decide to grow up and act like an adult, get back to me.

Are you 5 years old? You're a one trick pony. Do you have anything of substance to offer or not? I don't claim to be part of national Israel and you are referring to national Israel, right? Stop lying about me. That is evil.

Neither am I, liar. Read post #1,416 and learn something so that you stop slandering me.

It does not say they were bodily resurrected. Look up the Greek word "zao" and see how it is used in scripture. It's not a word to describe someone being bodily resurrected, but rather describes someone being alive and living. It's a reference to the souls of the dead in Christ living and...

I think those who unjustly and wickedly condemn others to hell the way you do are in danger of eternity in the lake of fire. That should concern you. No one is trying to steal national Israel's identity, so that is a false claim. Scripture speaks of two different Israels, not one, and the one...

A great multitude of souls in heaven. John saw the souls of the dead in Christ in heaven, not anyone with immortal bodies (Revelation 6:9-11, Revelation 20:4). Do you believe in soul sleep? Is that why you can't recognize that it's talking about their souls being in heaven?