Search results

I think he would agree with that part when it comes to what happens during Satan's little season, but the problem is that he apparently thinks they were all righteous for a thousand years before that, but then they suddenly all become wicked when Satan is loosed. We're talking probably billions...

So, you allow secular sources to define what a Christian is for you. Why do you treat secular encyclopedias as if they are scripture?

Right. That applies to all nations, as you said. So, if (relatively) few are chosen in any given nation, how can it be considered a Christian nation? Wouldn't there need to at least be a majority of people in that nation that are Christians in order for it to be considered a Christian nation? I...

And where is this taught in scripture? Why does that matter? Why would God need to prove anything to anyone? I don't believe God feels like He has to prove anything to anyone. And where does scripture teach this? There are no Christian nations and never have been. Where does scripture teach...

Agree. Apparently, no matter how many times they said it, some would still not believe it.

When the term Christian is correctly defined then it should be clear that the concept of Christian nations is utterly ludicrous. Only by using a loose (and inaccurate) definition of the term could anyone conclude that there has ever been such a thing as a Christian nation.

But, he didn't just quote the scripture. He also added commentary explaining his understanding of it. Why don't you do the same? You never do that, though. You never take scripture and break it down and show how it supports your view. It's very difficult to take you seriously because of that.

Do you actually think we can derive biblical and spiritual truth from those secular sources? You have to be kidding. Where is the holy scripture that backs up your claims? How can you not understand that we get frustrated when you resort to referring to secular sources like Wikipedia and...

Yes, he did. That one nation is called the Israel of God. Or Spiritual Israel as many of us call it. Galatians 6:14 May I never boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. 15 Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision...

So I guess your statement that it "goes without saying" isn't really true then? Since you did explain it before. Of course I have. And I agree with him. What other kind of people would unite to try to destroy "the camp of the saints"? Is it your contention that those people who number "as the...

I had to look up what that word means. No, I'm really not. But, whatever.

Blah blah blah. Let me know when you are able to explain your view in a way that makes sense, if that ever happens.

I know that you all know I will. ;)

This is complete nonsense. The only thing you get right is that all of the dead will be raised on the day of Jesus's future coming. What you get very wrong is that you have the unsaved being resurrected with mortal bodies. Scripture never teaches that. Jesus said in John 5:28-29 that the...

I will. :)

Why are you connecting imaginary dots? In 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 Paul indicated that Christ's resurrection itself is the first resurrection and then at His future coming there will be a resurrection of the dead in Christ. Any other resurrections of believers that you come up with are not taught...

You did say in your OP ("That doesn’t mean you can’t post another boxing match, just that I won’t read it. Lol). But, I guess you are reading it. LOL.

LOL. If you are not able to clearly explain your doctrine, then that says a lot about your doctrine. The truth is not meant to be difficult to explain. Such nonsense. The first resurrection is just that. The first one in order. To say it's anything else is a case of twisting scripture to fit...

LOL. You are the one in way over your head. The truth is not nearly as convoluted as you make it out to be.

LOL. What a cop out. This is what you came up with to get out of explaining why you believe there will be a mass resurrection even before the first resurrection? Wow. I'm sure everyone here can see that your doctrine is ridiculously convoluted and can't possibly be true.