Search results

Here is a fact. You said this to Christian Gedge: It is not true that he has "very little regard for" the truth. If he's mistaken in his beliefs, as you think is the case, so be it. It doesn't mean he isn't sincerely seeking the truth. Being mistaken doesn't equate to not having any regard for...

Huh? It seems to me that being concerned is what would make me want to say something. So, I did. What are you talking about? You have every right to post, but if you don't have anything productive to offer, which you often don't, then it's best for you to not post in those cases. The question...

Scripture sometimes speaks generally about things that can have exceptions, but are normally (generally) true. It's true of most that they die once. But, there are exceptions like Lazarus. If Lazarus was resurrected with an immortal body, then what does this verse mean: Acts 26:23 that the...

It's called the first resurrection (singular), not the first resurrections (plural). Stop trying to change scripture.

Good grief. You act as if you haven't already said this 79 times. Okay, I'm done with you for good now. You don't listen. This is a waste of time.

What makes you a child is your inability (or lack of willingness) to specifically address points that I make and questions that I ask. Instead of doing that, you just copy and paste your pat responses over and over again. I address things you say specifically. You ignore what others say and just...

I don't have the names of the NIV translators or the names of the translators of other English translations, but a number of translations contain footnotes indicating the other possible meaning of the word. Which shows that the translators were not all in agreement on what the word means...

Since you are informing me that you will continue repeating yourself, I probably will have no choice but to just put you on ignore. I don't need to be told the same exact thing more than once. I don't just copy and paste the same exact responses over and over like you do. You are a robot. You...

The Greek word that is used in verse 4, zao, is not a word that refers to someone being resurrected from the dead. Instead, it is a word that refers to someone being alive and living. The Greek word anazao, however, is a word used to refer to someone being revived or resurrected and that word is...

Of course you would say that. I exposed your flawed logic and you don't want to acknowledge it. You are no Greek scholar, either. You apparently think that Strong is the only Greek scholar who has ever lived. You should not worship people the way you worship him. There are Greek scholars who...

The fact is that you lied by accusing Christian Gedge of not caring about the truth. He most certainly does. If you disagree with him, fine, but can't you just leave it at that? You need to resort to lying and making personal insults, too?

Did I lie and claim that someone else doesn't care about the truth like he did? No. It's interesting that you come to the defense of a pre-trib dispensationalist. You have more in common with them than with Amils, it seems.

Jesus only talked about the abomination of desolation once. Paul only wrote about the man of sin once. They felt no need to repeat themselves. Why don't you follow their example?

Good. You shouldn't. But, you clearly do because you keep responding to me. If you didn't care, you wouldn't respond.

No, I'm claiming that in order for you to be consistent in your logic you should believe that mystery Babylon is a literal woman as well. So, do you? Do you deny that there are other definitions of that Greek word than "a man"? Another definition is mankind and that is how it is used in...

You provided a link to it. He made it clear that he's not interested in that. I defend him because I feel the same way as he does. We're here to talk to people like you. If we want to go to other websites or read books then we would be doing that instead of being here.

It's the impression that you give by what you say here. Maybe you should work on not giving the impression that you rely a great deal on others for understanding instead of your own studies.

You are an immature child. To suggest that he has very little regard for the truth couldn't be further from the truth. Are you unable to discuss these things like an adult? What do your childish insults accomplish?

How long after the 69th week, though? It does not specify that. Are you one of those people who falsely defines the word "after" as meaning "at the end of"? Are you thinking it's saying that He would be cut off at the end of the 69th week? If so, that is wrong. It says He would be cut off AFTER...

Did he say you can't (are unable to) think for yourself or that you don't seem to be doing that? There's a difference. I fully believe you can think for yourself, and I think he most likely believes that, too. But, you do give the impression that you don't always think for yourself and you rely...