Search results

We've seen this before on other forums. They try to find any way they can to avoid having to address arguments that they have no answer to. The few responses you've gotten so far are just personal rants without any substance or convincing arguments in them. This is in stark contrast to the...

One example would be the part that talks about how the promises God made to Abraham and his seed applied specifically to Christ and His people who have faith like Abraham, as Galatians 3:16-29 talks about. Do you see that clearly taught in the OT anywhere? Premils often misapply OT passages that...

So, you're telling me that you didn't read any of Davy's posts in this thread?

Calm down. Where did he deny Christ's second coming? Nowhere.

What in the world kind of response is this? I asked nicely. You could have just said "No, thanks". You're acting like I was demanding that you stay on topic. If you don't want to, that's up to you. Just thought I'd try to at least get some response to the original topic before going off topic...

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Can you just answer one question. Why is it that you are singling out Paul M. and myself about the way we're talking while having nothing at all to say about how other posters like Davy are talking in this thread? He basically accused Paul M. of not...

I'm not interested in talking about him any further. I'm interested in talking about what this thread is supposed to be about. Do you have any thoughts at all on what was said in the original post? Let's just take one of the points, such as this one: (5) Premil is always explaining away the...

I haven't talked to you that way, though. And I don't plan to. I only talk that way to Davy because that seems to be his preferred way of communication. I'm just trying to talk to him in a way that he can understand.

That's fine. But, it's interesting that you don't criticize Davy for his style. Any reason for that?

Aren't you a premillennialist? In the Premil view, the literal end of sins on earth doesn't occur until 1000+ years after the second coming of Christ. So, do you think the 70th week will occur around 1000 years after the second coming of Christ?

Just 1 or 2 for now would be fine. Why are you here if you have no interest in defending your doctrine? This is mainly a debate forum. You seem to be looking for some other type of discussion than a debate for some reason. You are free to share your views just like anyone else. You will get a...

But other Premils can talk like that all they want without you saying anything about it. You're rather selective in what you find to be objectionable. I see how it is.

Yes, I know, and you noticeably didn't respond to his post similarly. Why not? I guess you are okay with him acting like a jerk and telling others they are FAKE just because they are sharing their views on scripture?

Let's just post links to articles on external sites back and forth. That's how forum discussions are supposed to work, right? :rolleyes:

Why didn't you respond like this to Davy's post where he called Paul "a FAKE"? You taking his side just because he's a Premil? He has some wacky beliefs that even other premils scratch their heads over, such as thinking that the ones who populate the earth during the supposed future millennium...

Paul, please notice how this guy is implying that you are not a true Christian. And he's telling you to repent? Unbelievable.

You deny His word by acting like a complete jerk and by treating others horribly and judging them instead of loving others even if they disagree with you as Jesus wants you to do. So, you are the one who needs to repent.

That is exactly what is taught in passages like these: 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. 11 Since everything will be destroyed in...

So, what other scriptures can you reference which you think support your interpretation of Revelation 20? Can you honestly say that your interpretation of those other passages isn't based on your interpretation of Revelation 20? Is Revelation 20 not the main passage you use to support your...

Just take one point at a time then. It's not that hard and I see no straw men arguments being made there. Just give me even one example of that, if you can. It isn't the same point over and over. Again, just take one at a time if reading about all 22 points is overwhelming for you.