Search results

You are obviously equating the fulfillment of "everlasting righteousness" to there being literal everlasting righteousness on earth. Well, that won't happen until the new (renewed) earth is ushered in. It is only at that point that there will be everlasting righteousness on the earth in the...

Can we please talk about this topic in a separate thread and keep this thread about why Premil doctrine is false?

It is actually premillennialists like you who oppose plain scripture. I will give just a few examples where they do this even though I could give many. Example 1: 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed...

Let the reader notice that our friend ewq1938 here completely ignores the context of Revelation 19:11-21, which obviously has to do with Christ destroying His enemies rather than ruling over them. And he also fails to look at the original prophecy from Psalm 2 which also clearly has the context...

Right. So, the point I keep trying to make to him is that the literal method that Christ will use to destroy His enemies at His return is not described in Revelation 19 and is instead described in other passages like 2 Thess 1:7-10 and 2 Peter 3:10-12.

Why would you not refer to the Old Testament prophecy that is being referenced there to see what it means? Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and...

What you don't get is that the same ones it says He will smite and tread in "the winepress or the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God" are the ones He will rule (Psalm 2:9 says "break") with a rod of iron. How exactly can He rule over people that He just destroyed? That makes no sense. It makes...

Do you agree that the sheep and goats are gathered before Christ's throne at the same time following His second coming in glory with His angels, as the following clearly indicates? Matthew 25:31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious...

How are you agreeing with Matthew 25:31-46 which portrays the unsaved being judged and cast into the lake of fire 1,000+ years before you think they will? It's undeniable that they are gathered along with the saved before the throne at the same time, so the only way you can get it to line up...

That doesn't remind you of this: Revelation 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. You...

So, just ignore the context of Acts 17:30-31 then. LOL. What a ridiculous case of twisting scripture. So, when it says God so loved the world, that doesn't include you? That's the kind of logic you're using here. LOL. Great argument. Very convincing. What do you call the new heavens and new...

Here is the translation of what you're saying: I'm not able to provide the supposed misquote and post number because they don't exist.

It's at least 99% of the time for me. I give you credit for somehow figuring out what he's saying more often than I do. :D

That's two different judgment days which contradicts Acts 17:31 which says that God has set one day to judge the world. The world can also include everyone like it does in John 3:16 and other verses. If it only ever meant the unsaved then you would have a point, but it doesn't. Why don't you...

I agree. Much more than one verse says that. Such as Matthew 24:35-39, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:10-12 and Revelation 19:17-18. Is that what you see here: Acts 17:30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. 31 For he has set a day when he...

I don't know what you're talking about. You're impossible to follow.

Why do you assume that it has to occur either in heaven or on earth in light of what this says: Revelation 20:11 Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. The earth and the heavens fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. When you look at this verse then you...

Yes, it does imply that it's talking about physical harm, but it's not a literal sword which you have acknowledged. Why do you act as if it is? It doesn't indicate that fire does not come down at that time, either. It's all symbolic. To think that the literal destruction has to resemble what it...

That point was not made in post #922. The point made there is that some Amils (very few) believe that it's not talking about physical martyrdom in Revelation 20:4, which I and most Amils disagree with. Please learn how to read.

Hey, your doctrine is the one that says keeping the Sabbath or not has something to do with the mark of the beast, not mine. That makes it a salvation issue because obviously if someone has the mark of the beast then they are not saved. LOL. You don't speak straightforwardly, so I can only guess...