Search results

Wow! Well, that is nothing more than a sick collection of misguided conjecture and hate-speech, full of errors and false claims. And apparently...it's contagious. :pensive:

Mine is not "hateful tone"--in fact, even what is mine, is not mine at all. But you are obviously also lacking all the information, thus seeing things a face value are jumping to conclusions that are not actually what is really going on at all...and thus, being used. You are a victim and don't...

Why are you associating that passage with "the saved", when the passage speaks not of the saved, but of "brute beasts" "twice dead?" "Brute beasts" refers to the "natural" man, and "twice dead" to those dead in both body and spirit, dead before the foundation of the world, and dead after also...

Yes, I hope for your sake, you realize that about yourself someday.

No...you speak out of your own pride, unwilling to hear "the written word of God" come to fruition, choosing rather to slander a brother and a servant of God. And I tell you by the word of Christ--you will have your portion with the hypocrites.

After all this time...you still get it wrong. I have cited the errors of the church--and if you take that out of your above post--you should be looking at me and what I have said completely different (even as you might do with Paul). Which means we have not yet got past your errors, and that is...

The problem is you have put the two together, and have only jump to conclusions without all the information. There is much that you do not know, and you have fallen into a trap...and it shows.

Wwweeell...it appears that it is the commentators who are looking at a different translation then...because the KJV doesn't have quotations, but reads as a proclamation from Isaiah without them speaking. But your initial point was about the seals, as was mine.

"be ye not mockers" doesn't exactly say, "Isaiah 28:10, it is given as mockery to Isaiah" as you have said.

Because your "signature" sets your hateful tone. But I will watch the video and comment again.

Hmmm, what translation states it so? That is not how the King James reads.

Knowledge yes, line upon line here a little there a little. But also the release and setting the captives free.

Yet another hatred thread :(

The point of reading scripture is only to "hear what the Spirit says", not to be linguistics detectives and try to figure things out on our own. We do not study unto all truth, but are lead. Which means there is no need for our own translation at all, for it is all in the hands of God, His...

Yes, I read what you wrote about that before. But that is not what I purposed in reply. Again, hypothetically...what would have to be for Paul's two statements to stand on their own and reconcile completely--without having to turn to literary or grammar reasoning--as the scriptures are not...

One point at a time is best. Paul did explain, but not in that passage. But before just going to the other passage where he explains-- What scenario would make Paul's statement of "we who are alive and remain" not limited to whether he was dead of alive at any given time? Can you think of any...

Maybe you could state what you believe to be contradictions one at a time, offering to your own claims the clarity that you are saying is not in the scriptures. I look forward to you doing so, but I will jump in here while I am at it: What you are perhaps not accounting for, is that a perfect...

That's not even true--you are not speaking the truth! Acts 17:11 only says that some who search the scriptures were "more noble." These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things...

“You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit!" You speak against God and the Word of God which is spirit, and His servants the prophets--and "every scribe instructed concerning the kingdom of heaven [who] is like a householder who brings out of his...

That is a lie.