Search results

Believe in God, and His salvation--love God, and your neighbor as yourself.

What you describe was no issue for Daniel, why is it an issue for you? The point is--No--your idea of no "higher spiritual meaning" is against a lot of what is in the scriptures. Meaning, you have made yourself a rule. Well, good luck with that--but it's not going to work with God, or His...

No, like I just said replying to your last post--where I gave you "one specific statement" that is wrong--as long as you keep denying what the specific scripture says. Don't forget, since you are wrong on even one little scripture--you are not qualified to judge anyone.

You quoted the scripture, stated what you thought and were trying to use it for and against--and your use and understanding were and are wrong. Your understanding is NOT "biblical teaching." I am not going to keep repeatedly explaining, when you keep denying what the scriptures say.

I addressed this already--No, in saying "we who are alive and remain" Paul was not just speaking to that audience living at that time. He is stating the terms for all time, but specifically since Pentecost when one could be "alive" in Christ in God, but "remain" in the flesh and in this world...

No, you are only giving yourself credit for fully understanding the scriptures, which you do not. You can assume and act as if you fully understand the scriptures and are qualified to judge others, but that doesn't mean it is true. So, the test you are using is only so good as your...

No. I will correct you (again). What that says...is the burden of proof is on you, or anyone who doesn't like what they hear.

That is not what I said. I said that you are comparing your own errored understanding of the scriptures, with the actual truth. Which is no better, but comparable with many throughout history, including those who crucified Christ, who--like you--thought they had it all figured out, but were...

You are not hearing me, or simply rejecting what I have said, although I have explained. But look, this is not a competition. You pridefully sticking to your own understanding and interpretation "proves nothing" either, false interpreters "say the same thing." Those are your words and that...

I don't like responding at all to those who post a video like throwing a bomb and then running... But it should be known that as @Ronald David Bruno stated, there are miracles every day. As for the types of miracles that this whole topic is about...parting of the Red Sea, manna from heaven...

Well if you are trying to say or convince people that God changes (therefore miracles came only for a time)--that's just wrong, not biblical.

Another video bomb of speculative interpretation. Thanks for removing the link!

"We speak what we know." Unfortunately you believe only the part you know. Part. Which is no better than a lie, based on your own understanding of what is written. The scriptures are correct--but your understanding of them is wrong. As for me, I claim nothing, but speak only what is given to...

Yes, even those with only part of what is true want to believe what is actually true. The problem then is that they only have 'part' and not "all truth", which in many cases is no better than a lie. The issue then, is one of humility, where no one with only part of the information should take a...

I could answer, but with your record of disdain and desire to find me wrong, I will just say: God decides.

That is absolutely correct. But then if there is any issue, it shows a departure from scriptures--which works BOTH ways. The matter simply remains one of understanding, and the examples are many BOTH ways. Many have been right, and also wrong--BOTH ways. Meaning, it is all still under the care...

What you have observed is not a shift in paradigm by Paul, but is the result of his ministry being most on the cusp between the Jews and the gentiles, thus the need for his "rightly dividing the word of truth." Paul literally had two different ministries that purposely transitioned from the...

I told you what was wrong with your own claims. Then I only meant to reason with you using your own terms, but you just wrote a page speaking against me, though I even complimented you. And what--your big gripe is that my message doesn't "agree with the apostolic gospel?" That is the very thing...

Indeed, Paul was sent not to abandon the elementary principals of the faith, but to press on beyond those elementary principals. Which we would all do well to do also, for Paul lead the Way of Christ unto the gentiles and the building of the church.

This (1 Timothy 1:20) is a great verse to show how God's word is alive, spiritual, and yet often seemingly limited in context--is actually more revealing than we first might have thought. The literal definition of "Hymenaeus" is "belonging to marriage", and "Alexander" is "man defender."...