Search results

You just offended many biblical characters--and God Himself. While it is true that there is a great deal of phony, would-be spiritualization, to take away all categorically was the cause of Woe from Christ against the lawyers. To the contrary, we are to hear what the spirit says by whatever means.

Good topic, but you should not have gone on to muddy the water. It is enough that Paul established a foundation upon which there were to be additional mysteries revealed--by him, but also those foretold of by Daniel and John that were sealed and would not come until the seventh angel is about to...

Oh, you mean, like speaking in parables? It's a Family tradition.

The better question would be, Why is there a women's (only) forum? When matters of God are posted, I have more than once responded considering the matter not specific to women, only to be told I had no business commenting. I beg your pardon! How rude! Not offended really--but I have been put...

Your explanation here is good--thank you! But there is a problem with using 'isms and such. Much gets lost when somewhat removed by assigning names other than those already given. Biblically speaking, a better description of the difference between the would-be dispensations given to the Jew and...

Those who speak against spiritualizing, speak against God. God is spirit, and is "spiritualizing" all who are born of Him.

That interpretation or understanding suffers the stumbling block of the flesh--thinking in terms of the flesh, and expecting that the passage refers to the Jews in the flesh. Indeed it does, but not in the way that you have understood it. To the contrary, the passage refers to "a time, times...

Typical. Coming full circle in a circular argument. But no, it is you who is evading the issue. I did indeed explained, saying you don't understand--like someone who has never been kissed trying to debate something they know nothing about. In which case (yours by definition), proof of God is...

You expressed confusion about this "odd topic" (did you forget already?):

I was responding to your confusion regarding science, Christians, and proof. As for a reasonable explanation, the Bible in addition to the natural and scientific evidence, is what is offered and is limited on purpose. You are supposed to be able to connect the dots, and if you cannot, it is an...

I'm not giving you my understanding or opinion, but a word from God. You're not completely wrong, but your understanding of the timing is all wrong. It was Paul who [only] eluded to the correct timing of the second coming of Christ, saying, "but each one in his own order" ("one" defined as in...

You hold to a 2,000 year old error. The bloodline continues, but the promise you hold to was not made to the seed of the flesh--God is spirit, and that transformation for Israel came and went with Messiah, after which there is no more Jew or Gentile, no male nor female, but the blessing upon...

YOU STILL HAVE NOT PROVED ANYTHING. A photo is not even necessarily proof either, and even kissing after the fact does does not prove a prior claim. Shall we go on, with me making the same demands of proof but only within the limits I set, as atheists do regarding proof of God? You think it's...

WE have no "hatred " for Israelis. Your whole stance is therefore likely ascew.

But YOU HAVE NOT PROVED IT. That's a fail. You got nothing.

So...you're saying your IQ is under 12 (because you have not proven anything). Interesting. Would you then be happy with "definitions" for proof of God? Fair is fair.

You don't understand. Have you ever been kissed, or in love? Prove it. And no, someone's would-be confirmation, is not proof. The problem is you're not allowing the evidence, but only what is of this world. And because you can't proved something so simple and obvious as love or kisses--your...

I would tend to agree--I love science--but that is not what the world is, or what we should be looking at. God and science looking under the same hood would undoubtedly come back with similar explanations regarding the mechanics of the world and universe. But unlike science, that is not where...

Interesting! I have wondered whether AI might even cause some people to question their long-held beliefs when given fact from a non-human source. Even so, like computers in general--they only know what they are told, or the data they are fed. Interestingly, our son gave medical reports data to...