Search results

It says Jesus would be cut off AFTER the 62 weeks, which occur after the first 7 weeks. So, that means the timing of His death falls some time after the 69th week ended and within the 70th week. Your false view doesn't even have Christ's death falling within any of the 70 weeks despite it being...

This is utter nonsense. Jesus is the one who called them good and faithful and you're saying "so called Good and Faithful" as if Jesus didn't know what He was talking about? They were the ones rewarded for how well they used what they were given. But, you're acting as if they did something...

Paul was absolutely not saying that a physical departure would occur first before the second coming occurs. The mass apostasy/falling away is global, not just in the ancient province of Asia or anything like that. You are going out of your way to deny the truth that Paul wrote about in 2...

You acknowledge that it refers to a departure from the faith, but still somehow conclude that the rapture will occur before that despite Paul explicitly teaching that the coming of Christ and rapture (gathering) will occur after that. Unbelievable.

The verse is referring to the elect being gathered from the entire earth, which I believe refers to the resurrected dead in Christ and those who are alive and remain until Christ's future coming and also from all of heaven which I believe represents the souls of the dead in Christ. Do you...

He does care that His word says that Jesus was crucified outside of the city of Jerusalem (John 19:20, Hebrews 13:12). But, some of you are trying desperately to get around that because of your understanding of the identity of Babylon in Revelation.

None of this takes into account the fact that John the Baptist was a prophet and did not die within the city walls of Jerusalem or in the nearby vicinity of Jerusalem. If Revelation 11:8 was saying that Jesus was crucified within a physical location that can be considered Jerusalem and if Luke...

Wrong. The walls represented the boundaries of the city of Jerusalem. You and others here make the verses which say that Jesus was crucified outside of the city meaningless (John 19:20, Hebrews 13:12). He was crucified outside of the city of Jerusalem for a reason. A similar reason to why the...

John the Baptist was a prophet and was not killed in Jerusalem or in a place outside the city walls that anyone would still call Jerusalem, so how do you reconcile that with your understanding of Luke 13:33 and Revelation 11:8?

Okay, so do you think He was saying that a prophet cannot perish outside the physical city of Jerusalem or that He was saying that a prophet cannot perish apart from Jerusalem in relation to "its rulers, its institutions, and the people responsible for such deaths"? You can compare this to how...

The verses which talk about where Jesus was crucified relate to what was the case when He was crucified. That should be obvious. The city boundaries being later extended is irrelevant. LOL. You are imagining these inconsistencies. You have no idea of what you're talking about. I go to great...

It's fine. Thank you for admitting that. Yeah, it's fine. Don't worry about it. Yes, you are, but you are ignorant about Amil so you just don't realize what you're doing. As an Amil I know when someone is accurately representing my beliefs or not. Whether you admit it or not, there is a lot...

How many times do I have to explain what that verse means? Other verses like John 19:20 and Hebrews 13:12 say that He was crucified outside of the city of Jerusalem. Do you not accept what those verses indicate? Read the verse after Luke 13:33. When Jesus referred to Jerusalem there He was...

Very serious. Do you take the following verses seriously or are they missing from your Bible? John 19:20 Then many of the Jews read this title, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city; and it was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. Hebrews 13:12 Therefore Jesus also, that He...

The rapture will occur when believers are gathered to meet Jesus. Both Matthew 24:29-31 and the parallel passage of Mark 13:24-27 reference the gathering of the elect when Jesus comes. The elect refer to believers in the church (Romans 8:31-34). So, what other gathering of believers can that...

One future coming. He will come from heaven in like manner as He ascended there (Acts 1:9-11). Yes. Both passages refer to the same one and only future coming of Christ with each giving different details about it. Not every passage about the second coming of Christ contains the same details...

How convenient for you to only consider one verse in the entire chapter to not be literal.

LOL. Thanks for sharing your opinions with no explanation of how you came up with them when it comes to identifying two candlesticks as two individuals, as no other scripture does. Including Revelation 1:20.

The Greek word Tote can refer to something that occurs an undetermined amount of time after what was previously written and does not have to refer to something that happens during the time period previously written about. So, I don't find your argument here to be convincing. And, after all this...

He lives in his own world. He thinks he alone understands the truth and no one else does. He's delusional. Did you know that he thinks he's the one Paul talked about in 1 Corinthians 12:2-4 who was caught up to the third heaven/paradise? Something is seriously wrong in his mind.