Search results

KJV 1 John 3:4 4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law KJV James 2:9 9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. The above are two new testament definitions of sin. Both inform me...

Inheriting the birthright never came automatically to the first born in the OT. The culture from Abraham and his children emerged had such a tradition, but Good went to great pains and lengths to show that the culture was wrong. The firstborn was not the automatically accepted receiver of the...

As far as you have seen obviously. Would you like to see?

So Jesus is a sinner now? ?????

Oh boy, that one observation could open up a cavern of dark and creepy things about Bible translations and versions.

Yes. And He demonstrated how kings of ought to behave. Not like this...

Which beast?

I don't know if he was prime he or not. If he was, and others recognized this, they were disobeying the will of Christ when He said... KJV Luke 22:25-27 25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called...

We aren't required to make any day holy. It is already holy. How you keep it holy according to the commandment is the question. Possibly the most common assertion made by the anti sabbatarians. Always without scriptural support.

On what authority do you make such a claim? Also for adultery. In fact, the NT testifies to theOT truth that all sin is deserving of death. Is the 4th commandment the only one you've disobeyed,?

Jesus came to the Ancient of Days... On earth?

Everywhere. The church in Rome in the early centuries was just one among many throughout Europe, Asia, Africa, and the east. It was the greedy power hungry prelates who took control of the civil power in the absence of the emperors... Having adulterous relations with the kings of the earth...

The paucity in evidence against the deity of Christ is reflected in the assumptions made by the antitrinitarians... They assume a denial of the trinity is tantamount to a denial of Christ's deity: not so. They also make the assumption that an acceptance of the deity of Christ must of necessity...

No, it's a dumb question and doesn't belong in an intelligent discussion. We all agree, although perhaps not on the timing, that Jesus is the Son of God. So when we are discussing praying to the Father... Sitting next to the Father... Etc etc etc, we are talking about two distinct individual...

I hope you don't make a habit of stating such categorical statements without any checking if they are actually true.

Can you apply the same logic to the following in light of your insistence that Jesus is merely one of many created beings and therefore one of many 'sons'? KJV 1 John 4:14 14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.

Everytime you do this, you deny the Father and the Son.

Do you know of any other of whom the Father said, "This is My Son, hear ye Him"? Yes. A Father. And your point? You are correct. But you are relying on your cleverness to debate and obfuscate rather than simply look for truth. In the scripture you quote above, indeed that is a unity of purpose...

Not one Pope, no. The entire succession of Popes from the 6th century on which head the institution. It is the institution that is the Antichrist, not the Popes, not the people within that institution, but the institution itself. The Popes are but spokesmen. They are the mouthpiece of the little...

There are numerous individuals and institutions over the centuries that have met one or more of the 10 or so criteria that prophecy requires for a true identification. But there is only one that meets every one of those criteria. Papal Rome.