Search results

Your fight is with Scripture (once again). God's people are described as a singular nation called out from amongst the nations (plural). The objective unindoctrinated Bible student will see that the people of God have been united as one into a trans-national spiritual nation. Race doesn't matter...

What question? Also, I referenced 3 texts that forbid your hypothesis.

A thousand years is used to describe a long indeterminate period of power and government. Hitler boasted that the Third Reich would last a thousand years. The Nazi Party used the terms Drittes Reich and Tausendjähriges Reich (Thousand-Year Reich) to describe the rule, power and vision of the...

This is totally wrong. I ignored nothing. You have yet to highlight where the second coming is actually mentioned in his quote. I wonder why??? It is simply not there. If it was, you would quickly (and without complaint) highlight it. All we get is avoidance of the obvious. This sums up your...

This is another invention by you. List all the supposed ECFs who taught this before the belief in the "restoration of the nation Israel waned"?

Where do you get Pretrib in the Bible?

All you have is your opinions. Quoting Scripture seems to be anathema to you.

Well put!

Are you not seeing a pattern with Premil responses? They are like this because they have nothing of biblical weight to support their position.

This sums up your eschatological position.

Amils oppose Replacement Theology. They believe in Expansion Theology. It you that is the No. 1 promoter of it on these boards: You have previously admitted: “The NT did supersede the OT, yes.” "Yes, what Israel had, has now been passed on to many European and other nations.” “So, the kingdom...

Suppose we were required to take these references to “a thousand generations” literally, then, it would indicate an actual earthly time period of around 40,000 years – 40 years multiplied by 1000. However, it is NOT in the slightest suggesting a thousand literal generations. It is simply telling...

That is a total lie, and you know it. You do it to be provocative. You like to stir the pot. Why can you not tell the truth? Even Premils have counseled you over the years to stop hurling it, but you refuse. You like to antagonize on this matter. You are quick to speak on behalf of of Amils and...

There you go again: avoid the evidence and force your views upon what Irenaeus taught. By being stubborn and bull-headed and ignoring the actual evidence, you are totally discrediting anything else you say. This could not be clearer. Your whole thesis has been totally demolished at every turn on...

It is difficult to reason with you. You are so besotted with Premil you cannot objectively and effectively analyze history or Scripture. I present key arguments which forbid your position and you totally ignore them, as if they were not given. You have to do this as your reasoning on this is...

No. It was the opposite way around. His confusion is explained by the fact that he relied heavily upon the writings of the pagan Sibyl prophetesses in his works. Here is the evidence: as the Sibyl testifies and says:-- "For then there shall be confusion of mortals throughout the whole earth...

If you would take the time to actually read your Bible instead of running your mouth off you might actually see what I am pressing at. Romans 9:6-13: “For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy...

Is a classic sign that he lost the battle along time ago. All as we are getting no is frustration and misrepresentations.

Hello! I was quoting Randy K. That shows, you do not even read the posts before you respond.

Can you not tell the truth? Do you get satisfaction out of deliberately twisting what others believe? Are you not convicted by the Holy Ghost? I have suitably refuted your argument on Israel and you had no answer, so do not give me that. The fact is, you are married to what your teachers have...