Search results

Moses employs `a thousand' in Deuteronomy 7:9 saying, "Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations." Is this a literal or figurative thousand? 1 Chronicles...

Context? Please do not go there. No! What facilitates Premil governs your hermeneutics. A literal straightforward objective reading seems to mean little for you. This is horrible hermeneutics. It is blatantly flawed and untrustworthy. As others have said: it is actually Amils who are the...

Absolutely. Good point!

Good to see you. Which chapter bro?

The unindoctrinated Bible student should have no difficulty in understanding the meaning and weightiness of the phrases/events “the beginning” and “the end.” That is because they actually mean what they say. These expressions are often used on their own throughout Scripture because the Holy...

What? Your rebuttal is Thomas Ice. Honestly? The main advocate of the Pretrib hoax in America and the Left Behind novels. Enough said! This confirms everything I have been alleging about your ignorance of this subject. Your reliance upon Ice steals the biscuit. This confirms everything I have...

Your reasons are totally untenable, and show a bias Premil approach, adding unto Scripture.

Isaiah 14:15-18, Isaiah 24:21-22 and Isaiah 66:22-24 all correlate. When Jesus comes the demonic realm is destroyed by being banished to the Lake of Fire. None of these passages make any mention of a future sin-cursed millennial period. That is because they relate to the new heavens and new...

Which ones? You come out with these claims but fail to provide hard historic support. That is because you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. You depend on flawed and bias Premil web pages that are as ill-researched and ignorant as you. You are way out of your depth. Nothing +...

Read the text instead of voicing your opinion all the time. After the great commission is the end. Hello! Every text proves that, including Revelation 19. Revelation 20 takes us back to the first resurrection. It relates to Christ defeating Satan during His earthly ministry and thus defeating...

It is a figurative term in Scripture and history. What is more, the text oozes symbolism. Finally, your view contradicts numerous Scripture that shows the second coming is the end of time, sin and sinners, crying and dying, disease and decay, Satan and his demons.

The text says it. Hello! What citizenship does the text say we are part of? Please quote Scripture.

Even you know, you are explaining away the obvious. You are talking in riddles and walking in circles. Stop fighting the text and attempting to explain away the wording of the Bible. We are now integral to the citizenship of Israel. The wall is gone since the cross. We have entered the NT...

That is ridiculous and butchers the inspired text. It exposed the bias and ad-hoc way Premils approach biblical terms. You explain away and reject anything that exposes Premil. The consistent harmonious meaning of the ekklesia is rejected yet you deny remnant theology, which shows a true...

Lol. Corroboration to Premils is interpreting their faulty opinion of Revelation 20 by their faulty opinion of Revelation 20. This is the most absurd and foolish form of hermeneutics imaginable.

You have nothing to bring to the table but insults. The reader can examine this whole thread and see that you have not brought anything of historic evidential value to this discussion. You have nothing.

I have showed you and you have rejected the scriptural texts. You have to. The fact is: we are the true children of Abraham, not ethnic Israel. We are the children of promise, not ethnic Israel. We are true Israeli citizens, not ethnic Israel. We are the circumcision, not ethnic Israel. We are...

Is there weeping in your millennium - yes or no?

Let us look again at the eternal perfect picture that is portrayed by the prophet in Isaiah 65:17-19: “For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create...

Why can you not just admit that what has been presented is historical facts? If there was an authentic rebuttal it would've come by now. All you can do is attack the messenger, rather than the message. The message is watertight. I suspect you know that. That is why we are getting these constant...