Search results

How would you know? "You have taken away the key of knowledge."

Obviously, it is you who does not know, for Christ said, "Most assuredly, I say to you, We speak what We know and testify what We have seen, and you do not receive Our witness." Ditto.

Your basic premise is askew, thus none of that is biblical, but the teachings of men.

I have just stated the core of all that is God, and have been faithful to what is small, and give what is greater. And this bothers you. No, we are not talking about my feelings...but yours.

It is a "sin" to have knowledge of God? Do you not hear your twisted words?

That is not biblical. According to scripture, Jesus had a literal body, which now is his literal church. Which even that does not tell all, and should not be understood as true, but merely the way in which those who do not know literal from the world, would understand. On the contrary, it is...

Then add yourself to the list of those who don't know a quote from God.

"God is spirit", "My words are spirit"...is not quoting God? Why should I even converse with you? You have no actual concept or knowledge of God.

No, He has created us in His image and the ultimate context He has manifest is a mere "dim" view of His greater reality - the only actual reality, which is on high. You are wrongly considering the objects of this parable created existence to be the subject, but they are not. This is the lesson...

If I am quoting God (and I am), then yes...because it is not me, but Him that has first said it. You should know that because God is spirit, that this is His Way.

Indeed it is, and in doing so, it proves your old earth planetary idea to be wrong: No shadow means, no solar and planetary system as such.

Good...because your first response was to come to the defense of the physical, rather than the spiritual.

Your opinion and imaginations about the translators opinions and imaginations - seriously, that's your case? No, sorry, but wordsmithing and speculations are not the elements of God's truth, and have no business being part of a bible study. Nonetheless, your theory does not hold up scripture...

Oh yes there is: Genesis 1:7 Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.

1 Corinthians 15:46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual.

This study would have merit according to the worldly law of reason, but not according to the laws of God. Actually, the problem is the expectation that the use of language is absolute. It's not. In fact, ALL language (including the scriptures) was confounded to every corner of the world by God...

No. Read it again, s-l-o-w-e-r this time.

Well...that would be the imperfect rumor, the teachings of men. Except it's utterly wrong, for it is God who is perfect...and He is spirit.

No...I can do nothing, I am just saying what God is doing. So, don't blame me. ...God first manifests everything in the physical, then spiritualizes everything. In other words..."first the natural, then the spiritual", just as it is written. Why are you not getting this? - This is all...

The fruit is evident. The word "spiritualizing" is not used in support of the Holy Spirit, but against. Which is the backlash of misunderstanding, ironically, because of would-be spiritual half-truths. The example you gave of the physical resurrection, is the perfect example. And because you...