Search results

If I stand with Christ and swear things of the Holy Spirit and of the Father, you who stand with the Father and swear the things of the Son and the Holy Spirit, and you who stand with the Holy Spirit and swear by Him the things of the Son and of the Father...can we agree as they do? No, sadly...

The same can be said of the Father and the Son.

Here: ...Was that just a typo?

Before the world was Jesus was...and there is no god of nature, only God. Jesus is God.

If they believed there is a creator and did not believe in other gods...this to is faith.

The law of faith is simply what is required by God...this is belief. Before His coming those who believed in the promise of his coming, and those after his coming who have believed that he has indeed come, are accredited with faith.

All who are born of the flesh are of the first Adam. There are none who are saved in their flesh - the flesh is not saved, but sacrificed. It is only in the spirit that one can actually be saved. The two groups you speak of are the flesh and the spirit, but the scriptures speak of two folds...

I did not say "in Hell", you did. On the contrary, I indicated that Christ was fully prepared to forgive those who "know not what they do." Nonetheless, most of the church fathers and leaders are indeed guilty. But it is most curious, that after you quote all the scriptures telling you so, you...

Just as I thought. Here you list the errors of the church and "the blind leaders of the blind" as your defense for doing the same. But no, people don't necessarily go to hell for being blind to the spiritual truth, or when "they know not what they do."

This (your comment above) is a great misunderstanding by many. Paul does not define the two as you have, but rather as those of the linage of the first Adam, and those of the Last Adam. The one being flesh, and the other being of Christ, a life-giving spirit. He also defines them as "the dead...

Tell us then...just how did you actually and literally eat Jesus' flesh and drink his actual blood as He commanded? (You keep harping on it, but have yet to answer.)

What He meant for our freedom, you have made a law, fallen from the grace you first received. Such light is darkness, not life, but death.

Bravo, you defend untruth quite well. Nonetheless, I know and will defend Truth.

Then you do not believe in having "the mind of Christ" as Paul claimed, and Jesus sending the Holy Spirit to "lead us in to all truth." I do.

That's not true.

Your first context lesson sentence, is out of context. (rolling eyes) And, yes, that is the problem here. We are not talking about the Word becoming FLESH, nor about bread. We are talking about the Son of God becoming "a life-giving spirit." The objects here, are not the subjects of...

No...you misunderstand. The perversion that is unworthy, is to not to see Him "as He is", which is spirit. But did He come in the flesh? Yes. But what did Paul say? "To live is Christ, and to die is gain." Which he explained, was "fruit" and a benefit to others if he stayed in the flesh...

Your proclamation reveals little of the mystery of God. In which case I will expound: The mystery of God, is no secret, but few understand that by the birth of one man, Adam, God has unfolded and exposed darkness and evil, into all people, and then by the birth of One man (the only begotten of...

The only freedom is to align with the creator of all things. Just what freedoms are you referring to?

She is defined in the scripture as having tempted all people. She is a metaphor for the flesh, also know as the man of sin.