So that would be a no.I used to be a Premil. I know they are not there. I have spent 22 years on similar sites watching Premils duck around these simple issues.
OK.
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So that would be a no.I used to be a Premil. I know they are not there. I have spent 22 years on similar sites watching Premils duck around these simple issues.
You deny His word by acting like a complete jerk and by treating others horribly and judging them instead of loving others even if they disagree with you as Jesus wants you to do. So, you are the one who needs to repent.
Paul, please notice how this guy is implying that you are not a true Christian. And he's telling you to repent? Unbelievable.A true Christian believes God's Word as written. You need to repent to Jesus and ask Him forgiveness for denying His Word.
Why didn't you respond like this to Davy's post where he called Paul "a FAKE"? You taking his side just because he's a Premil? He has some wacky beliefs that even other premils scratch their heads over, such as thinking that the ones who populate the earth during the supposed future millennium are those who will be resurrected with mortal bodies.
A true Christian believes God's Word as written. You need to repent to Jesus and ask Him forgiveness for denying His Word.
No, you avoided my points.
Again, you interprtet Rev 20 by your opinion of Rev 20.
Premil is always explaining away
It uses indistinct or misunderstood Old Testament Scripture to negate and reject clear and explicit New Testament Scripture that teaches otherwise
which you force a literal meaning upon.
Obviously you have nothing.
Can you honestly say that your
You have an obvious difficulty with addressing simple direct questions
You force that into the sacred text.
This is a classic case of Premil eisegesis.
but you have ducked around them
also refuse to address the literal reading of Scripture
watching Premils duck around
But, I guess you don't care about that.
You foolishly deny
You also foolishly don't understand
You deny His word by acting like a complete jerk
by treating others horribly and judging them instead of loving others
I was responding to you regarding your post.Why didn't you respond like this to Davy's post where he called Paul "a FAKE"? You taking his side just because he's a Premil? He has some wacky beliefs that even other premils scratch their heads over, such as thinking that the ones who populate the earth during the supposed future millennium are those who will be resurrected with mortal bodies.
Let's just post links to articles on external sites back and forth. That's how forum discussions are supposed to work, right?Been down this road many times, rather than spending lots of time, I'll let a scholar argue the theology for me:
Amillennialism critiqued – LifeCoach4God
Yes, I know, and you noticeably didn't respond to his post similarly. Why not? I guess you are okay with him acting like a jerk and telling others they are FAKE just because they are sharing their views on scripture?I was responding to you regarding your post.
But I guess this doesn't matter to you, so, OK.
This is almost funny. If you told me to prove that the seals were not open, I would tell you to check Matthew 24. How is it that you do not understand these things?Just go to the Olivet Discourse and understand that you are mistaken.
But other Premils can talk like that all they want without you saying anything about it. You're rather selective in what you find to be objectionable. I see how it is.And that's just a few minutes scanning through posts.
Excuse me if I'm not so interested in this style of discussion. Filled with vanity.
Much love!
Just 1 or 2 for now would be fine. Why are you here if you have no interest in defending your doctrine? This is mainly a debate forum. You seem to be looking for some other type of discussion than a debate for some reason. You are free to share your views just like anyone else. You will get a better response if you don't respond like Davy by calling call someone FAKE for merely expressing their views with supporting scripture.Will you change your mind if I show you 10 passages? 20? 50?
Much love!
I think I've posted an array of responses received.You will get a better response
Think about this for a moment.You will get a better response if you don't respond like Davy by calling call someone FAKE for merely expressing their views with supporting scripture.
That's fine. But, it's interesting that you don't criticize Davy for his style. Any reason for that?I think I've posted an array of responses received.
Yes, I'm here for debate, but something more reasoned and polite. Not like this. I'm just not interested in the style.
Much love!
I haven't talked to you that way, though. And I don't plan to. I only talk that way to Davy because that seems to be his preferred way of communication. I'm just trying to talk to him in a way that he can understand.Think about this for a moment.
I've not done that. And I've shown the responses I'm getting. Do you see the disconnect? I'm not acting that way, you and others are. And there is no appeal in listening to that, in what should be a Christian discussion.
The more you deflect to him . . . the more I'll focus on you.That's fine. But, it's interesting that you don't criticize Davy for his style. Any reason for that?
And that's just a few minutes scanning through posts.
Excuse me if I'm not so interested in this style of discussion. Filled with vanity.
Much love!
In this instance I was being selective in what I responded concerning.You're rather selective in what you find to be objectionable. I see how it is.
In this instance I was being selective in what I responded concerning.
Your assertion that I'm selective in what I find objectionable is along the lines of "intellectual dishonesty". Do you understand how that is so? That I'd "find someone objectionable" except I supress that because I support their POV otherwise?
Much love!