Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
There is no "difficulty" with dispensationalist eschatology. So give us a specific example.A post to an essay on the difficulty with dispensationalist eschatology
Darby's claim that a pre-trib rapture of the Church to heaven, is seen in 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 below "A Lie"There is no "difficulty" with dispensationalist eschatology. So give us a specific example.
Well quite evidently you have not seen the HUGE DIFFERENCES between the Rapture and the Second Coming. The passage quoted is strictly about the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, and Darby is irrelevant. It was Christ who taught about this first.That seen below is nothing more than the second coming of Jesus Christ and the last day resurrection, no pre-trib rapture is seen as dispensationalism falsely claims
100% agree.Well quite evidently you have not seen the HUGE DIFFERENCES between the Rapture and the Second Coming. The passage quoted is strictly about the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, and Darby is irrelevant. It was Christ who taught about this first.
ah, 100%; that concept that a man should not be allowed to utter, imo.100% agree.
Well..I’m female so am allowed! 100%!!ah, 100%; that concept that a man should not be allowed to utter, imo.
“Always, never, for sure, no doubt, impossible” etc
lol
The passage quoted is strictly about the Pre-Tribulation Rapture
Not at all. One simply has to exegete the passage properly in light of all the other passages on the Rapture. No extra-biblical sources whatsoever.You only arrive at this conclusion after you are taught it from extra biblical sources
1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 Isn't A Pre-Tribulation Rapture, Dont Be DeceivedWell quite evidently you have not seen the HUGE DIFFERENCES between the Rapture and the Second Coming. The passage quoted is strictly about the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, and Darby is irrelevant. It was Christ who taught about this first.
The "last day" is a period of time which extends well beyond 1,000 years. When you recall that a thousand years in the sight of God are equivalent to one day, you will learn to interpret the Bible properly. So that entire post of yours is nonsense.THE LAST DAY RESURRECTION
The teaching of a pre-trib rapture is contrary to scripture, bend, twist, and tear, at scripture in desperate attempts to validate the claim made, that's comparable to Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy being seen in scriptureThe "last day" is a period of time which extends well beyond 1,000 years. When you recall that a thousand years in the sight of God are equivalent to one day, you will learn to interpret the Bible properly. So that entire post of yours is nonsense.
Not at all. One simply has to exegete the passage properly in light of all the other passages on the Rapture. No extra-biblical sources whatsoever.
@Goldie75 Good to see you contribute on the forums.... :)Well..I’m female so am allowed! 100%!!
Eta: having said that, I have no place debating stuff…it’s not my calling or gifting. So, “100% agree” on very few occasions is probably the most you’ll hear from me in such threads. I’m just gently and slowly learning where people are coming from - no offence meant. :)
Say what now?The "last day" is a period of time which extends well beyond 1,000 years. When you recall that a thousand years in the sight of God are equivalent to one day, you will learn to interpret the Bible properly. So that entire post of yours is nonsense.
"The last day" includes both the resurrection of the just and the resurrection of the unjust. The resurrection of the Tribulation Saints is separated from the resurrection of the unsaved by one thousand years. And prior to that the main Resurrection/Rapture occurs at least seven year before the Millennium. So you do the math. This is all included in "the Last Day" -- a metaphor for a period of time, not a 24 hour day. This is not about "over the course" but distinct events separated by over 1,000 years.You're trying to tell me that Jesus was talking about raising people from the dead over the course of "well beyond 1,000 years"? Come on. That's nonsense. The last day is just that.
Two distinct events separate by over a thousand years? How can the first of those two events be considered the last day then? In what sense is it the last day if there's still over 1,000 years of history yet to take place after that? That makes no sense. You are not accepting what Jesus taught in John 5:28-29. You're not allowing more clear scripture like that to help you understand the more difficult scripture contained within the highly symbolic book of Revelation."The last day" includes both the resurrection of the just and the resurrection of the unjust. The resurrection of the Tribulation Saints is separated from the resurrection of the unsaved by one thousand years. And prior to that the main Resurrection/Rapture occurs at least seven year before the Millennium. So you do the math. This is all included in "the Last Day" -- a metaphor for a period of time, not a 24 hour day. This is not about "over the course" but distinct events separated by over 1,000 years.