Timtofly
Well-Known Member
Then you don't view Revelation as symbolism at all? Just filler words to take up space?Where did I say anything about them coming to the earth? I didn't. Are you able to comprehend anything you read? Do you realize you misunderstand almost everything you read which results in you misrepresenting almost everything that people say to you? What is the reason for that?
Of course they are not literal! Why would anyone be literally riding on a white horse coming down from heaven? Do you think there are literal white horses in heaven? Do you also think that Jesus will be slaying people with a literal sword coming out of His mouth?
Hidden meanings? There are no hidden meanings there in Revelation 19. There are other scriptures which speak about Jesus destroying His enemies when He returns (Matt 24:35-39, 1 Thess 5:2-3, 2 Thess 1:7-9, 2 Peter 3:10-12), so there is nothing hidden about it. It's just described in a symbolic way.
Where does it say they come to the earth? You're making things up.
You clearly have no understanding of how symbolism works. Do you not understand that symbols don't have to resemble what they symbolize? For example, Satan is symbolized as a dragon with seven heads and ten horns. Does he look like a dragon with seven heads and ten horns in reality? Of course not. So, why do you insist that things that are described symbolically have to look just like what they are symbolizing in reality?
There is not a Lamb, not a book, no thrones, no seals, no trumpets, no angels, no souls, no people, no horses, no kings, no kingdoms? All that is, is a bunch of words to take up space, because God, Judgment, and Second Coming would only take up one line of text?
Either that or the real thing would be too boring, so John spiced it up a bit?
I am not insisting anything. I accept that John wrote what he saw. Are you insisting John literally did not see anything?
Did you ever stop to think that you may be taking Peter too seriously, and John not serious enough? Perhaps the earth does not burn up at all if there is no literal fire?
Perhaps one second everything is there, and the next second there is literally nothing? Then suddenly there is a brand new creation? You blinked, and a thousand plus years happened while you were not paying attention?
John states he sees a battle on earth at Armageddon. Do you think there is not a battle at all? All of humanity left after Satan's 42 months are just gathered to this battlefield? They just all fall down dead at the correct moment? Because there is no one else around, except those in heaven looking down on the earth? You seem to claim there is no Second Coming at all then. After these humans arrive at Armageddon, they just disappear like the rest of creation, and they don't feel a thing, until tossed into the LOF?
John calls it a battle symbolically, but literally nothing happens at all? Obviously it cannot be a Second Coming because there is no coming nor going anywhere. You claim all remain in heaven, and everything on earth instantly disappears to be replaced instantly with a brand new creation, with literally nothing on earth, because we are given symbolic pictures that literally have no meaning at all. It is a wait and see moment, because we won't know anything until that moment happens.