"Rev 19:12 says, speaking of Christ, "His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
But ......I do.
EH????
I am getting long in the tooth, and with old age comes the tendency to repeat oneself, so please forgive me if I’ve posted most of this before.
But in respect of the particular challenge of this thread I have always questioned what I see as ‘Bibliolatry’, preferring what I call the ‘Way of the Spirit’ as being how Christianity was originally intended to be led.
After all is said and done there was no Bible as such until Constantine decreed that one should be produced 300 years after the Spirit was given at Pentecost.
There were indeed ‘Apostolic Writings’ during the period that that the church (the Body of Christ) was being established, and they referred to the authenticity of the Old Testament (2Tim 3:16 for example).
And it was good that some of those writings were preserved, despite the fact that the ‘church’ was rapidly falling into apostasy and tampered with them to suit their preferences.
However God still ‘speaks’ to those who have ears to hear but just How does he do so?
I have to say that what I call ‘The Way of the Spirit’ is to be open to the voice of God which I believe ‘speaks’ into what is described as “the fleshy tables of the heart”.
And I believe that for God ‘thus to speak’ it has to be outside of the five human senses of touch, sight, sound, smell, or taste.
Therefore, for God thus to speak, the Bible as such (which can only be seen by the human eye, or heard by the human ear if read) cannot be the voice of God; it can only be one of the vehicles that God uses in order to generate his voice in the heart.
And that has to be via an extra human sensory perception.
Whether or not Shakers, Amish, or early Quakers got to that understanding I am not sure, but it seems to me that they may well have been close (particularly the Quakers)
My burden however is to ease men off the misconception that I believe to have become endemic, whereby the vehicle is mistaken for the goods being conveyed, or the menu is mistaken for the meal.
Whilst the Bible may be most frequently used in conveying/generating the voice of God in the heart, it is not the only vehicle IMO.
Under this understanding it matters little which version of the Bible is being used, whether its canonisation omitted books that deserved inclusion, or whether the ‘church’ tinkered with the manuscripts.
The goods within the vehicle remain available even if one of the vehicle’s wheels falls off……it’s just getting at them that becomes more difficult.
That ‘wheel off’ factor is, IMO, why Christ in Matthew 13 is quoted at great length to portray the survival of the Kingdom of Heaven against so many difficulties (not least that of apostasy) leaving it as a precious hidden treasure to be sought with diligence, and valued above all else when found.
And so my advice to SkyWalker is, "Seek and ye shall find"…..but it will necessitate some enormous resolve against the opposition of most of Christendom.