AI Book Report/Interview: St. John's Mystery (An End Times study for sure!)

[JimKnox]

Presumptious little man, aren't you?

 

[ScottA]

Presumptious little man, aren't you?

Confirmation

 

[JimKnox]

Confirmation

Blocked

 

[ScottA]

Blocked

By the measure you use, so shall it be measured back to you. So let it be bound in heaven. Amen

 

[bdavidc]

I have explained plenty, more than you deserve.

But your whole position hangs one word: "prove"--which I gave you, though you did not perceive it. And apparently it is also apparent that you do not know that "prove" is also defined as "APprove." Which leaves you with nothing but your prejudice.

You can not help but twist the Scripture. Please wake up before it is too late. In 1 Thessalonians 5:21, “prove all things” means test or examine them, not blindly approve them. The very next words are “hold fast that which is good,” which requires distinguishing truth from error.

You still have not shown one verse identifying your book as the fulfillment of Revelation 10. Instead of proving your claim from Scripture, you twist a word to avoid the issue. You have been warned repeatedly. Your private claims are not revelation, and your book has no authority from God simply because you say it does.

 

[bdavidc]

Or...if I do have biblical right--and I do--you are in big trouble, and it gets worse with every post. Because you are speaking against what Jesus arranged for our time.

You don't have any right to twist scripture and add your false teaching to the word of God. You are one of the “wandering stars” Jude warned about, a false teacher with no fixed truth except your own claims. Jude says of such men, “wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever” (Jude 13).

You have been repeatedly asked to prove your claims from Scripture, and instead you keep exalting your private revelation and yourself. That is not biblical teaching. It is exactly the kind of dangerous, self-authorized teaching Jude warned the church about. Repent of it.

 

[bdavidc]

Not that language takes precedence (because it doesn't) but even your language skills are failing you. As a result you are simply not understanding what you are reading.

And then you start accusing, showing your true self. Which I will rightly not continue responding to forever.

This is more evasion. Instead of answering the Scriptures, you attack my “language skills” and then complain about accusations.

The accusation is simple and documented: you claim private revelation and prophetic authority that you cannot prove from Scripture. Calling me ignorant does not change that.

Either prove your claims from the Bible or stop pretending insults are an answer.

Scripture does not tell us to pamper false teachers. It says to “rebuke them sharply” (Titus 1:13), and that a faithful man must be able “by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers” (Titus 1:9).

You have been asked repeatedly to prove your claims from Scripture. Instead, you attack the people challenging you, claim special understanding, and refuse to answer the texts put before you.

You said, “Which I will rightly not continue responding to forever.” Actually, that would be wonderful. If you would simply stop pushing your false teachings, there would be nothing left to answer.

 

[bdavidc]

Brother; you have far FAR more patience with wolves in sheep's clothing than I.
Well done.
However, a man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition, reject. (Paraphrased)
He will not hear you because he cannot.

I understand Titus 3:10, and I agree there comes a point when you stop trying to persuade the false teacher himself.

But I am not continuing these replies for ScottA’s sake. I am answering for the people reading who may be deceived by what he is teaching.

Paul warned the flock about “grievous wolves” and said, “therefore watch” (Acts 20:29–31). Romans 16:18 warns that false teachers “deceive the hearts of the simple.” Jude tells us to “earnestly contend for the faith” (Jude 3).

So I am not expecting Scott to suddenly listen. But I do pray he does. I am making sure the people reading see the biblical answer. False teaching should not be allowed to stand unchallenged where it may mislead others.

 

[ScottA]

You don't have any right to twist scripture and add your false teaching to the word of God. You are one of the “wandering stars” Jude warned about, a false teacher with no fixed truth except your own claims. Jude says of such men, “wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever” (Jude 13).

You have been repeatedly asked to prove your claims from Scripture, and instead you keep exalting your private revelation and yourself.

That's a lie.

 

[bdavidc]

Neither will your not correctly discerning the times and the unexpected, like those who killed the prophets, and the Priests and Pharisees who did the same with Christ and the apostles. Only this time its worse for you than for them, because you should have learned from their mistakes.

You are a false teacher promoting a lie by claiming new revelations to add to the bible, the word of God says add thou not unto his words lest he reprove thee and thou be found a liar ~Proverbs 30:6, and if any man shall add unto these things God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book ~Revelation 22:18, you keep resisting correction and speaking as though rejecting your teaching is the same as rejecting the prophets the apostles or Christ Himself, that is a lie and self exaltation, Paul said for we preach not ourselves but Christ Jesus the Lord ~2 Corinthians 4:5, and if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received let him be accursed ~Galatians 1:9, the faith was once delivered unto the saints ~Jude 3, the bible never established you as a prophet or apostle with authority to add to the scriptures so stop claiming what God never gave you.

 

[bdavidc]

That's a lie.

Then prove it, ScottA. Show the Scripture that identifies you, your book, or your private revelation as something God appointed for these last days.

Calling my statement a lie does not answer it. You have been asked repeatedly for biblical proof, and you still have not provided it.

If I lied, show exactly where. If you cannot, then stop making accusations and answer the Word of God.

 

[ScottA]

This is more evasion. Instead of answering the Scriptures, you attack my “language skills” and then complain about accusations.

Jesus said, "My sheep hear My voice." But when I speak what He has said, and also what is His, you hear not. Nor do you understand, but argue, judge, and accuse based on the interpretations and teachings of men.

The accusation is simple and documented: you claim private revelation and prophetic authority that you cannot prove from Scripture. Calling me ignorant does not change that.

That's a lie.

 

[bdavidc]

Jesus said, "My sheep hear My voice." But when I speak what He has said, and also what is His, you hear not. Nor do you understand, but argue, judge, and accuse based on the interpretations and teachings of men.


That's a lie.

John 10:27 says Christ’s sheep hear His voice. It does not say they must hear yours. You are not Christ.

You are doing it again. You speak your own claims, then treat rejecting them as rejecting Christ. That is exactly the self-exaltation you have been warned about.

And simply saying “that’s a lie” proves nothing. Show the Scripture that gives you the prophetic authority and private revelation you claim. Until you do, your accusation is just another deflection.

From your own words, it seems to me you are under a strong delusion. Scripture warns that God will send “strong delusion, that they should believe a lie” (2 Thessalonians 2:11), and that “evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived” (2 Timothy 3:13).

You claim to speak with Jesus’ voice and to have new revelation, yet when that is challenged from Scripture, you simply call the charge a lie. That looks exactly like the pattern of someone who is deceiving himself and refusing to submit to the clear Word of God.

Please wake up before this goes any further.

 

[ScottA]

John 10:27 says Christ’s sheep hear His voice. It does not say they must hear yours. You are not Christ.

You are doing it again. You speak your own claims, then treat rejecting them as rejecting Christ. That is exactly the self-exaltation you have been warned about.

And simply saying “that’s a lie” proves nothing. Show the Scripture that gives you the prophetic authority and private revelation you claim. Until you do, your accusation is just another deflection.

From your own words, it seems to me you are under a strong delusion. Scripture warns that God will send “strong delusion, that they should believe a lie” (2 Thessalonians 2:11), and that “evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived” (2 Timothy 3:13).

You claim to speak with Jesus’ voice and to have new revelation, yet when that is challenged from Scripture, you simply call the charge a lie. That looks exactly like the pattern of someone who is deceiving himself and refusing to submit to the clear Word of God.

Please wake up before this goes any further.

You quoted Paul, but speak against him as you have also spoken against me. For he said, "For me, to live is Christ." All which is anti-Christ. For He said, "He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me."

 

[bdavidc]

You quoted Paul, but speak against him as you have also spoken against me. For he said, "For me, to live is Christ." All which is anti-Christ. For He said, "He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me."

You are twisting Scripture to defend yourself, and you are doing exactly what I have been warning you about. Paul saying, “For to me to live is Christ” does not mean Paul was Christ, and it certainly does not mean that every word Paul spoke was automatically the voice of Jesus. The verse right before it says, “Christ shall be magnified in my body” (Philippians 1:20, KJV). Paul knew the difference between himself and Christ. He was the servant. Christ was the Lord.

Then you quote, “He that heareth you heareth me” as though Jesus was talking about you personally. He was speaking to men He had personally chosen and sent. You do not get to take that authority and place it on yourself, then act like anyone who rejects your claims is rejecting Jesus Christ. That is not what the passage says.

The Bible tells me to test what you say. “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God” (1 John 4:1, KJV). The Bereans even tested what Paul preached by searching the Scriptures daily “whether those things were so” (Acts 17:11, KJV). Yet you keep acting as though your words should not be tested, and that rejecting what you say is the same as rejecting Christ.

That is a dangerous place to put yourself.

Paul said, “For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus’ sake” (2 Corinthians 4:5, KJV). Paul did not make himself the standard. He pointed people to Christ. You keep doing the opposite. You keep using Scripture in a way that places your own claims on the same level as the voice of Christ.

You are not Christ. Your words are not His words unless you can show it from the bible. Your claimed revelations are not above Scripture, and no amount of quoting Luke 10:16 changes that.

Galatians 1:8 says, “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” Even an angel claiming heavenly authority was to be rejected if his message did not agree with what had already been revealed. So do not act as though your claims are somehow beyond examination.

Stop using Scripture to protect yourself from Scripture. Submit what you are saying to the written Word of God. If you cannot prove these claims from Scripture, then stop claiming that rejecting your words is rejecting Jesus Christ.

 

[ScottA]

You are twisting Scripture to defend yourself, and you are doing exactly what I have been warning you about

That's a lie.

 

[ScottA]

“For to me to live is Christ” does not mean Paul was Christ, and it certainly does not mean that every word Paul spoke was automatically the voice of Jesus. The verse right before it says, “Christ shall be magnified in my body” (Philippians 1:20, KJV). Paul knew the difference between himself and Christ. He was the servant. Christ was the Lord.

Apparently you do not know the meaning of being One with Christ in God.

 

[ScottA]

Then you quote, “He that heareth you heareth me” as though Jesus was talking about you personally. He was speaking to men He had personally chosen and sent. You do not get to take that authority and place it on yourself, then act like anyone who rejects your claims is rejecting Jesus Christ. That is not what the passage says.

No one chooses or sends themselves, but few are chosen and few are send. And you--you speak against Him who chooses and sends whoever He chooses, as it is written.

 

[ScottA]

Yet you keep acting as though your words should not be tested, and that rejecting what you say is the same as rejecting Christ.

That's a lie.

 

[Scott Downey]

AI takes what you tell it and reflects it back to you. I read through a lot of your discourse. You guided it, and it went where you took it.

Like the part about "pre-recorded in heaven", gets around the "new revelation" objection, but only by stating a source. AI didn't come up with that, but when you prompted it that this was an OK workaround, that's what it went with.

I have to agree with the others, AI is an echo chamber, even if you are wrong about something. It's all in the way you prompt it.

Much love!

Actually the AI was pushing back against the claims. Bringing up objections. The AI did not agree or disagree with the claims, yet did point out why it might be rejected by many.