Anyone going to watch the Presidential debates?
- Thread starter Debp
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
- Status
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
And basically Biden doesn't have a clue what he's talking about so why anyone at all is voting for him is beyond me. He hasn't done anything!! My cat does more than him!! Honestly!! 
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
The 10th Amendment GIVES THE STATES the power to burn down their communities and cities. -- I believe it's in the CONSTITUTION.
Bobby Jo
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
10th Amendment! Check it out!
Now AFTER THE ELECTION, Trump has suggest that he will use the Insurrection ACT of 1807 to go INTO the States, Cities, and Communities to quell the civil disorder. :)
Report: Pentagon Brass Privately Discussing What To Do If Trump Invokes Insurrection Act
Bobby Jo
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry nothing against you or anything but I find that completely unbelievable that that's in the Constitution. That very much sounds illegal.
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
The Tenth Amendment, -- known as STATES RIGHTS:
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.[1] It expresses the principle of federalism, also known as states' rights by stating that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers not forbidden to the states by the Constitution, are reserved to each state, or its people.
... and of course, the Armed Services are PROHIBITED from being deployed IN THE UNITED STATES, -- so if Trump does invoke the Insurrection Act, the Military will be used to enforce the rule of law, as it has in previous U.S. history.
:)
Bobby Jo
Insurrection act:
The Act empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard:
when requested by a state's legislature, or governor if the legislature cannot be convened, to address an insurrection against that state (§ 251),
to address an insurrection, in any state, which makes it impracticable to enforce the law (§ 252), or
to address an insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy, in any state, which results in the deprivation of Constitutionally-secured rights, and where the state is unable, fails, or refuses to protect said rights (§ 253).
It's the third reason that is being used.
Portland and Seattle and I'm not sure where else's response to the rioting is what the problem is. These mayors and governors have encouraged these riots and deprived the other citizens of these cities their rights.
Portland and Seattle and I'm not sure where else's response to the rioting is what the problem is. These mayors and governors have encouraged these riots and deprived the other citizens of these cities their rights.
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
NO, No, no, no.
All I'm saying is that the States are responsible for enacting and enforcing their own laws. And if a State (or community therein) declines to prosecute these criminals for their actions, then that's the STATE's Prerogative.
And Trump can only step in when the welfare of the Nation is at risk.
https://www.history.com/news/little-rock-nine-brown-v-board-eisenhower-101-airborne
On September 23, [1957] President Eisenhower issued Executive Order 10730, which put the Arkansas National Guard under federal authority, and sent 1,000 U.S. Army troops from the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, to maintain order as Central High School desegregated.
On September 23, [1957] President Eisenhower issued Executive Order 10730, which put the Arkansas National Guard under federal authority, and sent 1,000 U.S. Army troops from the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, to maintain order as Central High School desegregated.
It's not something to be taken lightly,
Bobby Jo
False. There is Chris Wallace (a total Leftist), Steve Scully, and Kristen Welker.
And if you don't think the debates will be skewed in Biden's favor, listen to this:
'In a statement, the Trump campaign complained the choice of moderators meant Biden would have a "teammate" on stage "most of the time," without being more specific about names.
"These are not the moderators we would have recommended if the campaign had been allowed to have any input. Some can be identified as clear opponents of President Trump, meaning Joe Biden will actually have a teammate on stage most of the time to help him excuse the radical, leftist agenda he is carrying.
One thing is sure: Chris Wallace’s selection ensures that Biden will finally see him face-to-face after dodging his interview requests. That is, if Biden actually shows up," Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh said.
The Trump campaign several weeks ago released a list of over 20 names it said it would like to see chosen as debate moderators, but none was selected...'
Moderators announced for 2020 presidential debates
As to the bias of media hack Chris Wallace:
"Chris Wallace is fresh off his tongue bath of Pete Buttigieg during a town hall on Faux News that probably wasn’t watched by many people. For those who did, it was disgusting, and it was as if Buttigieg was on CNN and MSNBC with the softball questions and praise he got from hack Wallace.
Today, as Trump’s defense team began Day 2 of their rebuttal, Chris Wallace was called out and he had a meltdown. He yelled at Katie Pavlich and told her “get your facts straight”. Of course it was Wallace who had his facts wrong.
Watch Chris Wallace have a total meltdown after being destroyed by Katie Pavlich...
Chris Wallace meltdown! Gets destroyed by Katie Pavlich
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
Chris Wallace, Objective? -- NO!
Katie Pavlich, Objective? -- YES!
Katie Pavlich, Objective? -- YES!
Katie Pavlich FOR MODERATOR! :)
Bobby Jo
Last edited:
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
So then my question is what state wouldn't want to prosecute them? Haven't they caused enough damage by now? How many more lives being lost is it going to take for them to realize that they need to stop being cowards and do something about this!! So pretty soon I will be voting and hope and pray to God that Trump stays in office.
historyb
Well-Known Member
You'ld have to show me where it says that, I'm not believing that one.
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
historyb
Well-Known Member
There is another possibility too, however unlikely they may want to have someone that won't hurt the party if they lose. I heard that on Rush the other day from a caller and it could make sense. Biden is their Bob Dole and he reminds me a lot of him not knowing were he is, waving at no one. Even Biden's VP is as bad as he is. Just a Theory
- Status
Similar threads
