Tell that to the Essenes Jews.
Huh? That is a strange appeal to the Essenes, because it does absolutely nothing to prove your interpretation of Revelation.
Yes, the Qumran community associated by many scholars with the Essenes used a
364-day solar calendar. But their calendar was a sectarian practice, not a divine command telling Christians how to interpret the numbers in Revelation.
More importantly, you have not answered my actual argument.
Where does Revelation itself say that its “1,260 days,” “42 months,” or “time, times, and half a time” must be converted into 3½ literal solar years and inserted into a prophetic calendar? Simply pointing to the Essenes doesn't establish that.
You're committing a basic category error:
an ancient Jewish sect having a calendar does not prove that John's apocalyptic numbers are intended as a literal chronological timetable.
And there is another problem with your argument: even the identification of the Qumran community with the Essenes is a scholarly conclusion, not an indisputable fact. The Library of Congress notes that many scholars make that identification while others argue that the evidence is insufficient to attribute all the sectarian material to one group.
So if you want to establish that Revelation teaches
3½ literal years, don't appeal to the Essenes.
Show it from Revelation. Demonstrate from the text itself that John intended these numbers as a literal calendar calculation rather than apocalyptic symbolism.
Until you can do that, “Tell that to the Essenes” isn't an argument. It's a distraction from the exegetical question.
Scripture must govern the interpretation—not the Essenes, not a prophetic chart, and not a doctrinal system imposed upon the text.
Hello?! Again...do better.