No, Insight. "Sin's flesh" is your own addition to that text. It says no such thing. Christ took on our sins by imputation in the same way that his righteousness is imputed to us for justification. Again, if Christ was born with Original Sin he could not have saved anyone.
It appears Nomad does not acknowledge Jesus offered for himself first, before he offered for his people. He is in fact breaking the type of the High Priest under the Law.
In other words Nomad cannot explain the uncleaness of sin's flesh which leads to death - Nomad would have us believe death is clean!
In affect Nomad is without a high priest who cannot cleanse him morally and physically.
The sprinkling of the typical blood on both by Moses prefigured the operation of divine love and wisdom in
Christ’s own sacrifice. It was a sacrifice operative on him first of all; for he is the beginning of the new creation, the first fruits of the new harvest, and the foundation of the new temple. He was the nucleus of a new and healthy life developed among men, for the healing of all who should become in association with it.
As such, it was needful that he should himself be the subject of the process, and the first reaper of the results. Hence the testimony that ’the God of peace that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus Christ, that Great Shepherd of the Sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant (Heb. 13:20), and that by his own blood, entering into the holy place he obtained (middle, or self subjective state of the verb) eternal redemption (’for us’ is interpolated)" (Heb 9:12).
The Father saved him from death, for his obedience unto death (Heb. 5:7,8,9; Phil. 2:8,9; Rom. 5:19).
Insight