There is still a definite lean toward one color or another here...
There are problems with both sides... and instead of defending one side or another, it might be better to focus on where the side you advocate fails, and try to see the possible merits of the ideas of the opposition...
We all know that the tax system is broken... We can agree to that, and the break is not just one party's fault...
We have one group pf people that advocate trickle up, and one group that advocate trickle down... People have argued about it forever... Here is an idea for everyone though... What happens when all of the money has trickled one way? In order for there to be a healthy system, we need real circulation happening... I would prefer something a bit more substantial than a trickle in either directions...
The only way to do this is to come to a middle ground where the people that need help get it, and the people who don't need help aren't punished for not needing help. In a healthy system, all members contribute, in some way. But right now, half the system isn't even given the opportunity to help...
As someone who has had experience in the under 50%, I can say that I never demanded more entitlements... I wasn't in the position to deny help that was available to me though. We did use food stamps, and had some help with our heating and electric bill one year... My husband and I worked hard to bring ourselves out of that percentage... but right now, being about $1500 into the tax payer's bracket at the end of the year, well, I can honestly say we were better off by about $8000 at the end of the year when we were getting government help, even though we were earning less money... We didn't have to pay taxes, plus none of the money we earned went towards groceries, and we had 4 months where our utilities were paid... We used the money we saved during that time to help ourselves into a taxpayer's bracket, but we are hardly better off for it right now.
So, as someone who knows the bitter sweet taste of help, I can honestly say that our system does not reward people for working to better themselves. This is where I see a flaw in the ultra liberal hand out ideology...
... A problem we have when we start forcing corporations to foot the tax bill is that they start finding other countries to move to, then we get put in a worse position... We lose jobs, and we lose taxable income...
When we tax the rich, they move their money out of country...
When we tax all things over and over, such as a person's income, plus the things they buy with that income, plus the property they have already payed sales tax on, plus account the money they save, etc... well we end up in brow beating discussions such as this...
When we try to tax people who don't have anything left to tax, well, you might as well try squeezing a walnut and see how much juice you get... and then try saving money when all your government officials are clocking over time trying to make people pay money they don't have.
Instead of pointing out what other people are missing about their own party, why not try figuring out where your own party misses the mark? Maybe then we might start to get somewhere.
What have i done ? the same as you perhaps but i realize it is a waste of time,you offer "solutions" that will never be tried so whats the difference...like always people like you take it personally.I speak in the collective because the individual doesn't matter anymore.The American people no longer have the ability collectively to do anything but what their masters tell them to do...ever heard of political "science" ? why do you think they have it down to a science ? is it because Americans are such intelligent,informed and cutting edge thinkers ?
Well, I don't think rolling over and taking it equals Christian attitude... Is it not said that idleness is the Devil's tool? I think we will be held accountable if we stop caring for the things that are considered our responsibility...
Even if no one pays attention to what those of us who have not given up have to say, and what we strive to achieve, then that is as it will be... God will see that we did what we could...
But all changes that have ever been made have started from one idea, that gained support from other people, and eventually was implemented. We will never effect a change if everyone decides a change is not worth the effort.
Tell me... What should we, who want to effect a change for the better spend our time doing... Should we keep arguing whether Catholicism is bad? Or whether homosexuals are going to hell? Or maybe keep debating the plausibility of Trinity doctrine? I enjoy other people's perspectives, but where does the Church's fascination with arguing about these topics glorify God?
If Christians can bring about a change in their nation that is to the benefit of everyone, does this not demonstrate the Love of God better than arguing the finer points of an individual's doctrine?