Rex
New Member
To Axehead
Sure he would have sinned fallen and He would have never been able tointervene for our sin.
Have you ever sinned?
The complete atonement for sin had not come in the form of Jesus, there was only the blood of lambs and bulls to cover sin.
The covering of Adam and Eve with skins, was the shedding of blood to cover in an imperfect way,-->> pointing to the blood and sacrifice of Christ.
Comparing Jesus and Adam and Eve with our situation is a straw-man like comparing apples and oranges.
A perfected man and woman fallen, a perfect man in Jesus over coming to save Adam and Eve.
We were born into A&E fallen condition, and we are not sinless as Jesus was.
How else do you suppose you, or anyone else is going to accepted? By your works, by your perfect life?
that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Did I say nothing could change that? No, but the implication from Angelina is sin "even in a spirit filled christian" leads to possession and your trying to find proof as well. It's pretty clear Paul is not speaking of being made perfect or being sinless as well. If you have a problem with the term in Christ then I suppose you can take it up with translators or Paul.
I agree and my point is that saying If your sins your not covered by Jesus sacrifice on the cross, and thats the implication from Angelina, about spirit filled believers. If you sin Satan---> has a right to you, her quote below
That simplicity is believing in Jesus unto salvation, against which there is no law.
To say I'm a born again believer in Jesus, and I sin---> that at this point Satan has a right to me is denying the simplicity of Christ.
That theology presumes there is no covering. This covering of our sins threw Jesus is grace, we walk in grace as we are being made in the image of Jesus. As we mature our walk becomes more and more holy, perfect in the likeness of Christ,
Angelina tried to use this angle to justify spiritual possession in Christians. And yes people fall away, they don't mature they follow after un biblical teachings. And many in my opinion, that have had demons cast out of them have never been born of the spirit in the first place.
But Satans rights to those that have received the covering of Christ for sins is not biblical in fact it denys salvation threw Christ.
Here are the warning about those that have received the spirit and turned away, I don't deny them.
Like Christians being demon possessed, and if you sin Satan has a right to you "even If you be born of the spirit in Christ"
Now you can defend such statements AH but scriptural evidence is not on your side.
I can see how defending the premise of possession has effected some peoples simplicity in salvation. Maybe you don't
But If Satan has a right to us in our sin, then the message of salvation threw Christ is of no value.
Now I consider Angelina a friend, and a friend doesn't pat me on the back and agree with me If they believe I'm in error.
I don't play that game, I believe this whole thread topic is un-scriptural and I'm not going to stand by and say yes to it when I disagree.
Proverbs 27:6
Let me ask you a question: When Satan tempted Jesus Christ in the wilderness, what "Right" would Satan have had if Jesus Christ obeyed him (sinned)?Let me ask you a question: When Satan tempted Jesus Christ in the wilderness, what "Right" would Satan have had if Jesus Christ obeyed him (sinned)?
Sure he would have sinned fallen and He would have never been able tointervene for our sin.
Have you ever sinned?
What rights did Satan receive when Adam (who was pure and innocent) sinned?
The complete atonement for sin had not come in the form of Jesus, there was only the blood of lambs and bulls to cover sin.
The covering of Adam and Eve with skins, was the shedding of blood to cover in an imperfect way,-->> pointing to the blood and sacrifice of Christ.
Comparing Jesus and Adam and Eve with our situation is a straw-man like comparing apples and oranges.
A perfected man and woman fallen, a perfect man in Jesus over coming to save Adam and Eve.
We were born into A&E fallen condition, and we are not sinless as Jesus was.
The point of the verse you mentioned is that we are no longer condemned, the life threw the spirit has over come the law of sin and death.The Key in vs 8 above is "in Christ Jesus". People have taken the posture that once someone has "prayed a prayer" they are positionally in Christ and nothing can ever change that and that they are somehow protected from the "doors" that sin opens in their lives to the enemy.
8 There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus,[a] who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh, 4 that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. 6 For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace. 7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be. 8 So then, those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
How else do you suppose you, or anyone else is going to accepted? By your works, by your perfect life?
that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Did I say nothing could change that? No, but the implication from Angelina is sin "even in a spirit filled christian" leads to possession and your trying to find proof as well. It's pretty clear Paul is not speaking of being made perfect or being sinless as well. If you have a problem with the term in Christ then I suppose you can take it up with translators or Paul.
If we are not turning to the Lord, then who are we turning to? We either welcome Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit into our lives or we welcome the unholy spirit, counterfeit Jesus into our lives.
Paul is talking to the Church in the verse below and he did not fail to mention to them that they could receive another spirit.
2Co_11:4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
I agree and my point is that saying If your sins your not covered by Jesus sacrifice on the cross, and thats the implication from Angelina, about spirit filled believers. If you sin Satan---> has a right to you, her quote below
Paul also said just before the verse you quoted, that he was fearful you be lead way, deceived.It is about authority and Satan is a legalist. :huh: he has a legal right to enter a believer's soul if they are being disobedient to God.
3 But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity[a] that is in Christ.
That simplicity is believing in Jesus unto salvation, against which there is no law.
To say I'm a born again believer in Jesus, and I sin---> that at this point Satan has a right to me is denying the simplicity of Christ.
It is about authority and Satan is a legalist. :huh: he has a legal right to enter a believer's soul if they are being disobedient to God.
That theology presumes there is no covering. This covering of our sins threw Jesus is grace, we walk in grace as we are being made in the image of Jesus. As we mature our walk becomes more and more holy, perfect in the likeness of Christ,
Angelina tried to use this angle to justify spiritual possession in Christians. And yes people fall away, they don't mature they follow after un biblical teachings. And many in my opinion, that have had demons cast out of them have never been born of the spirit in the first place.
But Satans rights to those that have received the covering of Christ for sins is not biblical in fact it denys salvation threw Christ.
Here are the warning about those that have received the spirit and turned away, I don't deny them.
18 For when they speak great swelling words of emptiness,Hebrews 6
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away,[b] to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
2 Peter 20
18 For when they speak great swelling words of emptiness, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through lewdness, the ones who have actually escaped[d] from those who live in error. 19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are slaves of corruption; for by whom a person is overcome, by him also he is brought into bondage. 20 For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning. 21 For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them. 22 But it has happened to them according to the true proverb: “A dog returns to his own vomit,”[e] and, “a sow, having washed, to her wallowing in the mire.”
Like Christians being demon possessed, and if you sin Satan has a right to you "even If you be born of the spirit in Christ"
Now you can defend such statements AH but scriptural evidence is not on your side.
I can see how defending the premise of possession has effected some peoples simplicity in salvation. Maybe you don't
But If Satan has a right to us in our sin, then the message of salvation threw Christ is of no value.
Now I consider Angelina a friend, and a friend doesn't pat me on the back and agree with me If they believe I'm in error.
I don't play that game, I believe this whole thread topic is un-scriptural and I'm not going to stand by and say yes to it when I disagree.
Proverbs 27:6