Don't Unitarians deny that Jesus is God? What about eternal Hell?

[kcnalp]

It's not about re-writing but ejecting trinitarianism interpretation onto unitarian text - which the whole Bible is. Funny thing, the Gospel of John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the entire New Testament.

You're trying to rewrite our Bible! You're not qualified!

 

[Wrangler]

Then why is the Word called He? lol
You're so JW!

Truth is that IS EXACTLY the trinitarian interpretation I'm talking about in John 6:60, the very same Greek word is properly translated as "this."

 

[Wrangler]

You're trying to rewrite our Bible! You're not qualified!

No. I'm only pointing out the absurdity of trinitarianism through Scripture. "For us, there is only one God, the Father." Some magical way, trinitarians take this explicit statement of unitarianism to mean anything else. (There is not verse, for us, there is a 3 in one God made up of ...)

 

[Wrangler]

Why not simply Google, what unitarians believe. Rather than ask that question when the rules here warn against discussing Unitarianism?

I am a unitarian Christian, not affiliated with the church by that name, Unitarian-Universalism, who have been taken over by Pagans.

 

[Enoch111]

I am a unitarian Christian, not affiliated with the church by that name, Unitarian-Universalism, who have been taken over by Pagans.

Unitarianism and Paganism are related. Both reject the Bible.

 

[Wrangler]

Unitarianism and Paganism are related. Both reject the Bible.

I accept the Bible.

 

[Pythagorean12]

Unitarianism and Paganism are related. Both reject the Bible.

I accept the Bible.

 

[kcnalp]

Truth is that IS EXACTLY the trinitarian interpretation I'm talking about in John 6:60, the very same Greek word is properly translated as "this."

Ok, so you're trying to rewrite our Bible just like JW's do all the time!

 

[kcnalp]

Unitarianism and Paganism are related. Both reject the Bible.

Bingo!

 

[Wrangler]

Ok, so you're trying to rewrite our Bible just like JW's do all the time!

LOL. You value tradition over the word of God. So far, your entire basis is to rely on a verse that does not even mention Jesus but put everything on he word rather than this word, like John 6:60.

Guess what? Even if true, 2 do not a trinity make. So fierce is the devotion to the man-is-god thesis, trinitarians tend to pretend that any verse that could be taken to allude to it, has the Holy Spirit coming along for the ride.

Spirit is not a 3rd being but an attribute of the 1 being. The re-write was done by 4th century trinitarians. It’s just we see through it.

You can’t even admit the trinity is not in the Bible.

 

[kcnalp]

LOL. You value tradition over the word of God. So far, your entire basis is to rely on a verse that does not even mention Jesus but put everything on he word rather than this word, like John 6:60.

Guess what? Even if true, 2 do not a trinity make. So fierce is the devotion to the man-is-god thesis, trinitarians tend to pretend that any verse that could be taken to allude to it, has the Holy Spirit coming along for the ride.

Spirit is not a 3rd being but an attribute of the 1 being. The re-write was done by 4th century trinitarians. It’s just we see through it.

You can’t even admit the trinity is not in the Bible.

Of course not. I'm not going to call God of the Bible a liar. Don't you even know that "NAME" is singular? Of course you don't!
Matthew 28:19 (NKJV)
19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the NAME of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

 

[Wrangler]

Of course not. I'm not going to call God of the Bible a liar. Don't you even know that "NAME" is singular?

I guess you place a lot of significance on this corrupted verse.

That is, you are reading your doctrine into dicta. If the verse read, “Go baptize in the name of Moe, Larry and Curly” that does not mean they are a triune God and that are salvation depends on believing it.

 

[JohnPaul]

Why not simply Google, what unitarians believe. Rather than ask that question when the rules here warn against discussing Unitarianism?

If we believe in God the Father and Christ as his only begotten Son, how are we Unitarians? If the Holy Spirit is what God instills in us, through believing in him and accepting Christ as his only begotten Son, I don't see how the Holy Spirit is a God, but rather what God instills in us.

 

[Pythagorean12]

Good question for the OP author.

 

[Wrangler]

If we believe in God the Father and Christ as his only begotten Son, how are we Unitarians?

Really? It’s all about believing only the Father is God. I believe in Aristotle. I believe in Napoleon. I believe in Jesus the Anointed (by God). I believe in President Trump.

I am a unitarian Christian. This means I believe Jesus’ God is the only God. See John 17:3.

 

[JohnPaul]

Really? It’s all about believing only the Father is God. I believe in Aristotle. I believe in Napoleon. I believe in Jesus the Anointed (by God). I believe in President Trump.

I am a unitarian Christian. This means I believe Jesus’ God is the only God. See John 17:3.

And you’re free to believe what you just as I am, unless you’re living in China or North Korea.

 

[kcnalp]

I guess you place a lot of significance on this corrupted verse.

Corrupted? You offer ZERO proof. It's your biased opinion VS our Bible.

That is, you are reading your doctrine into dicta. If the verse read, “Go baptize in the name of Moe, Larry and Curly” that does not mean they are a triune God and that are salvation depends on believing it.

There you go folks, Wrangler comparing the three stooges to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit!

 

[Wrangler]

Corrupted? You offer ZERO proof.

I have numerous times in other threads. Just ignore the rest of what I wrote. If I offer the proof of the corruption of the verse, will you alter your belief system?

 

[kcnalp]

I have numerous times in other threads. Just ignore the rest of what I wrote. If I offer the proof of the corruption of the verse, will you alter your belief system?

What you have proven is that you are trying to rewrite our Bible. I don't think you're qualified.

 

[Wrangler]

What you have proven is that you are trying to rewrite our Bible. I don't think you're qualified.

The trinity is not in the Bible. The rewrite is proven to be by trinitarians.