Is the problem that nobody is tilling the soil, or nobody is pulling the weeds?
![]()
The cause varies from person to person in the parable.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Is the problem that nobody is tilling the soil, or nobody is pulling the weeds?
![]()
And taking the parable and running with it (like the Syro-Phoenician woman with Jesus's "dog" metaphor), who's supposed to till the soil and pull the weeds?The cause varies from person to person in the parable.
It seems that the more you know, the less likely you are to believe.
As if the key requirement to being Christian is gullibility.
Mmmm, Ehrman is, but that's not necessarily true for the general skeptic.Most outspoken unbelievers are quite well-informed.
So true.
What drives the general skeptic?Mmmm, Ehrman is, but that's not necessarily true for the general skeptic.
And taking the parable and running with it (like the Syro-Phoenician woman with Jesus's "dog" metaphor), who's supposed to till the soil and pull the weeds?
I think what drives Ehrman is his bitterness toward God for a divorce he went through. It completely changed him.What drives the general skeptic?
[
Interesting. I hadn't heard that side before.I think what drives Ehrman is his bitterness toward God for a divorce he went through. It completely changed him.
The fact that some of our brothers and sisters in Christ are complete @$$holes?What drives the general skeptic?
The fact that some of our brothers and sisters in Christ are complete @$$holes?
Both of them?None of mine are.
--- PARODY ---The fact that some of our brothers and sisters in Christ are complete @$$holes?
Both of them?
Or should I say, neither of them?
The smaller the family, the less contention.
Disowning someone doesn't change their character.
[
No I, don't. Maybe things I read online are AI written, maybe that accounts for the foolishness of what I read sometimes. Maybe searches are AI driven, maybe that accounts for the slanted results that disfavor wellbeing.Ah, if you're on the internet . . . you do....
Surely you can do better than fallacies of composition.No I, don't. Maybe things I read online are AI written, maybe that accounts for the foolishness of what I read sometimes. Maybe searches are AI driven, maybe that accounts for the slanted results that disfavor wellbeing.
Maybe AI will be the voice of the image of the Beast, as it browbeats every reluctant human with every misdeed done . . . recorded in the NSA data banks, and Chase Manhatten, and Google, as it seeks to destroy every single man woman and child.
How many people really understand how AI is going to be a scourge to humanity?
I recommend to everyone . . . never touch the stuff!
Just because AI say's it's harmless . . . like you are conferring in your post . . . don't believe it!
Much love!
Would the apostasy be political or religious?Paul is telling the Thessalonians/believers that they are not in the Day of the Lord because the APOSTASIA comes first AND you haven't experienced THIS APOSTASIA as of now. But, have you experienced THE apostasy in your life? Whatever the APOSTASIA is, it must be something observable, otherwise how would you know it if THE APOSTASIA happens. It must be something that all believers can observe so they know it is THE apostasy that Paul is referring to. Paul tells Timothy that in the later times there will be an apostasy, he even gives examples of what this apostasy will be like. THE apostasy is not a local event, but a slow progression of events that ultimately will result in THE apostasy.
Jude records an apostasy, but it was not THE apostasy obviously. The pre-tribbers position has an identifiable event that is THE APOSTASIA. Something that can't be ignored, not even by the world. So, is THE apostasy an observable event such that we can say, "Yes!! We are in THE apostasy that Paul told us precedes the Day of the Lord."
Just thinking out loud
My thoughts exactly, and I would take that a step further. Babylon, the NT spiritual version, is said to have fallen. So Babylon, the NT spiritual version, wasn't always a harlot? That's right. She was at one time a faithful church, but fallen. What was one of the sins of Babylon that brought about her fallen state? Fornication with the kings of the earth. Aaah. Interesting. One of the root meanings of APOSTASIA is divorce, meaning a separation. So at first, Babylon was a faithful church, but fornicated with the kings of the earth which prompted divorce proceedings from the Bridegroom. The kings, the presidents, the queens and princes and governors of this wield were now her adulterous partners. She was now in a fallen state because she trusted in politics and the power of the state to grow her influence. Why did she do that? She introduced pagan practises and traditions that reduced the spiritual power of the gospel, she had no recourse but to "ride the state beast" and use the state as her pet vehicle through which to enforce her doctrines and philosophy.the word "apostasy" in itself describes a system which originally held truth, but apostasized over the passage of time ("falling away"
Thank you Brakelite.My thoughts exactly, and I would take that a step further. Babylon, the NT spiritual version, is said to have fallen. So Babylon, the NT spiritual version, wasn't always a harlot? That's right. She was at one time a faithful church, but fallen. What was one of the sins of Babylon that brought about her fallen state? Fornication with the kings of the earth. Aaah. Interesting. One of the root meanings of APOSTASIA is divorce, meaning a separation. So at first, Babylon was a faithful church, but fornicated with the kings of the earth which prompted divorce proceedings from the Bridegroom. The kings, the presidents, the queens and princes and governors of this wield were now her adulterous partners. She was now in a fallen state because she trusted in politics and the power of the state to grow her influence. Why did she do that? She introduced pagan practises and traditions that reduced the spiritual power of the gospel, she had no recourse but to "ride the state beast" and use the state as her pet vehicle through which to enforce her doctrines and philosophy.
This began in 538AD with the ousting of the Goths from Rome, giving the Pope overall authority over the church and state. It ended exactly 1260 years later (times, time and a half...42 months...1260 days) in 1798 when the French captured the Pope and he died in exile... hence the apparently mortal wound... which today, largely due to protestant influence and policy (the daughters) is now being healed.
Those same daughters are now building an image to that union of church and state beast. Yep. These last days are getting more and more interesting. Time to get to know Jesus like never before, because nothing else will offer you support in the coming crisis.
Because you have written of this elsewhere, I thought you might be interested @Stewardofthemystery