I at least like to see people put forth an intellectual argument.
No created human being will be able to understand the Revelation using human intellect, no matter how much knowledge we have. We have to ask God to give us the understanding of His Revelation. It's HIS Revelation, not ours.
And because our understanding is not the same as the grace of God in our salvation - which is given freely to ALL those who believe in Christ - to some God will give more understanding, less to others - because without the work needed being done by the reader (familiarizing oneself with the Old Testament), the things in the Revelation that allude to the Old Testament are not going to be understood by the reader.
So, when the 7th seal is taken off what happened? An Angel took the censor [of prayers]filled it with fore (THINK Incoming Asteroid)and cast it down to earth. This asteroid impact will cause call manner of bad tidings, but an Earthquake would be a major sign of an impact, and it would be on fire as it hit, and it would be worse than all the Nuclear bombs on earth now going off in one place (Thunder & Lightnings).
Nowhere does the Revelation tell you the above will happen, nor even what will cause the 'earthquake'. "The stars" have been used as a metaphor for God's elect
since Genesis 15:5, and Genesis 37:9 and Revelation 12:1, together with the analogy of untimely figs (produced out of their season) tells us that Revelation 6:13 is not talking about literal events,
if we interpret the Revelation by the Revelation (Revelation 6:13 by Revelation 12:1), and if we interpret scripture with scripture:
The same metaphor was used as early as Judges 5:20 when the children of Naphtali and Zebulun fought against Sisera, captain of Jabin's army (Judges 4:6-7),
where they are called "the stars in their courses" (metaphor) fighting against enemy armies in Judges 5:20.
The saints are also said to be "in the heavens" in Ephesians 2:6; Colossians 3:1-4; and Ephesians 1:3.
The same metaphor is used by the Old Testament prophets.
For example when Isiah prophesies
against Babylon and about the coming invasion of the Persian armies:
Isaiah 13
17
Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, which shall not regard silver; and as for gold, they shall not delight in it.
18 Their bows also shall dash the young men to pieces; and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eye shall not spare children.
19
And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.
Describing this calamity
Babylon was to suffer, Isaiah earlier on in the same chapter wrote:
9
Behold, the day of Yhwh cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.
10
For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.
11 And I will punish the world for their evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogancy of the proud to cease, and will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible.
12 I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a
The fact that the above prophecy
also projects forward to the time of the Day of Christ / Day of the LORD teaches us that
the Revelation is using the same biblical metaphor:
Hebrews 12
26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying,
Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.
27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.
There is also a serious problem with your "seven years", which I believe can only mean that your interpretation of Daniel 9:27 is false:
Daniel 9:26-27 was telling the Jews that the Messiah would be
cut off - as Isaiah 53:8 said He would be - by the action of the people -
AFTER (H00310 achar] (verse 26) the completion of the first 62 + 7 weeks.
The covenant being spoken about has
nothing to do with the man of sin or the beast which is coming. It was talking about the Covenant
God made with the house of Israel and the house of Judah and the New Covenant in the Messiah's blood.
But the Messiah was
cut off in the middle of
the 70th week because the people demanded He be cut off,
not realizing that in the process He would fulfill the prophecies of 'Messiah son of Joseph' the suffering servant (Isaiah 53).
And because He was cut off
through their actions, becoming the Lamb of God, He could not
at the time fulfill the remainder of the prophecies of the son of David, the conquering king, becoming the Lion of the tribe of Judah.
There is NO seven years to be completed. Only 42 months remain - and this is the 42 months
spoken of in the Revelation.
Also,
the Jews all know both who that man was who caused the daily sacrifice to cease, and when that 1,335 days began to be counted, and when it was completed - because to this day they all still celebrate channukah. It's only Christians who want to cut every single prophecy that has already been fulfilled
out of its historical context and paste it into their favorite folder labeled
"The end of the age and the return of Christ".
The 1,335 days was fulfilled long, long ago by
the man who is the biblical type of the man of sin of 2 Thess 2:4 - the one many call "the Antichrist" - and it was fulfilled over a hundred years before Christ came -
as was the prophecy that the daily sacrifice would be taken away until that period was completed.
There will be
no daily sacrifice taken away again. That daily sacrifice stopped forever when the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D (let alone only for 1,335 days following 70 A.D).
The 1,335 days was not fulfilled following 70 A.D when the daily sacrifice was stopped because of the fact that IT WAS NO LONGER THE HOLY PLACE and only Christ and His church is the temple of God. Therefore it will not be completed following any reconstructed so-called "3rd temple" either.
The truth - which at least all the Jewish Rabbis know - is that the 1,335 days was completed in the days of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, and if this were not so, then the Jews are celebrating a feast called channukah once every year
based on fake news.
But many Christians love to bluff themselves into believing that every prophecy
must be about them.
The armies mentioned in
the 6th trumpet are the same as the armies being gathered for Armageddon in
the 6th bowl of wrath, and this is why the kings of the earth mentioned in
the 6th seal know that the wrath of God is soon to follow.
The 5th trumpet tells us about the abyss being opened, and just as
Revelation 9:4, 13:8 and 16:2 informs us, only those men which have
not the seal of God in their foreheads will be tormented by that plague.
The 5th bowl of wrath (Revelation 16:10-11) is talking about exactly the same torment that the 5th trumpet is talking about
The 5th seal is informing us that
the beast is soon to make war against the saints in the great tribulation - which in the entire New Testament refers to the tribulation of the saints at the hand of unbelievers and the unbelieving authorities of this world.
The 7th trumpet begins by telling us that the kingdoms of this world
ARE BECOME the kingdoms of our Lord and of His Christ, and then informs us about the judgment of the beast and his kingdom - which is the same things we read about in
the 7th bowl of wrath, and the reason why we see
the same symbols of thunderings, ligthenings and an earthquake in the 7th seal.
Revelation 8:6 should be the start of a new chapter, because they are the beginning of the events that were written in the scroll in heaven
before the scroll was sealed with seven seals.
(The chapter divisions were only added to scripture by
one man in 1226 A.D and though he did a good job and I for one am very, very grateful for his job (otherwise it would be an enormously difficult task to find ANYTHING again in scripture without having the chapter reference), nevertheless his chapter divisions are not always perfectly placed).
But if you are going to add human imagination about asteroids etc to the text
when the text says no such thing, and base your interpretation upon misinterpretations of other parts of scripture (such as Daniel 9:26-27), then your interpretation is
going to be less than perfect
- in
some respects to the same extent that the interpretation of the one who does
not ask God for understanding and does
not do the necessary Bible study of the Old Testament, but only uses his human intellect and imagination, is completely faulty.