Not all posts are meant to be responded to. Some are just meant to make you think.
ok well i do appreciate it, don't get me wrong ok, it's just that imo what you want me to think v what i think there are maybe not lining up like you might think, what do you think about that? Or maybe i can put this another way,
I can't find "the Fall of Man" in Scripture anywhere, for starters
Sin entered into the world through Adam giving up his spiritual position to Satan by being tricked out of it through disobedience to God...and consequently many angels who also partook of this opportunity for conquest of God's new creation.
The angels who came down to have dominion over mankind are called "the Nephilim". In Hebrew this means "the fallen ones."
did you think i meant that i am so new i just haven't been exposed to...what you posted there yet?
or that i am so out of line that i need a refresher?
either way see how it might be perceived that we are not even really having a conversation here?
so see if you will why i am offended now, whereas if you had started your post with "you are so new you just haven't been exposed to...what i am posting here yet..." or "you are so out of line that you need a refresher;" ok?
Bc as it is right now i can only assume you meant to override my observation with something you consider more pertinent, fine, but then when i state objections to it,
ok ty, i don't agree with much of this wadr
even they are disregarded, see. So i kinda have to ask why are you even talking, um,
to me? You already know what a pain i am, right, so how do you expect me to interpret this?