If you think that Noah's flood was global, then bet on it

[TheHC]

I assume P2 is 0. How many USD do you want to bet based on this weighting scheme/odds?

First of all, who’s covering my bet? You? I’ve got $3M.
Exactly how, and from whom, do I collect my $30M when I win? From you?

I see you’ve posted a lot of ’bets.’

 

[TonyChanYT]

First of all, who’s covering my bet? You? I’ve got $3M.

You don't understand the relationship between your weighting scheme and odds mathematically. See Subjective (Bayesian) Probability and wagering and follow up there if you have any questions about it.

 

[TheHC]

You don't understand the relationship between your weighting scheme and odds mathematically. See Subjective (Bayesian) Probability and wagering and follow up there if you have any questions about it.

Thanks, I read the Wikipedia article,
but really, you can’t rely on science to answer some questions….modern scientific organizations are too wedded to naturalism to accept the supernatural as a cause for anything. It wasn’t always that way — Newton, Kepler, Boyle, et. al., had no issue attributing creation to a Higher Intelligence — but now it’s different.

That’s their problem.

BTW, I edited my prior post, adding more evidence to “probability” rationales

Have a great day, my cousin..

 

[TonyChanYT]

you can’t rely on science to answer some questions

Right. I am not. I am relying on science for the betting. Can you see the difference? I am relying on God to settle the bet. Do you wish to continue the betting?