Iran vs Israel | Gog and Magog War?

[Marilyn C]

A lot of misapplication of Scripture here. And you still don't get it. Read again from my previous post:

"Didn't you bother to read the context to find out that God has rebuked Judah (not northern Israel) during the days of Isaiah about 740BC. It is because although they were still performing religious rituals in the temple, they were morally corrupt, socially unjust, and spiritually unfaithful? Read Isaiah 1:18-20 carefully. God called them out for fake religion and warning them of judgment unless they repent. Well you should know what happened to Judah since she has not repented, during the days of Jeremiah. Nothing to do with Daniel 9. Selah!"

Now, for the umpteenth time—Daniel 9:27 is not about Old Testament Israel. That’s right—she was already made desolate in verse 26. You missed that part? Again? The kingdom was taken from her, and Christ confirmed the covenant with the New Testament Israel, which is the Church. That’s who now carries the kingdom mandate since the Cross. THIS is who offers sacrifice—not with animals, but through Christ Himself which He will end it -- AFTER finish building the church with all Elect secured FIRST. This is something that you are in blind to this truth.

So yes, once more for clarity: you’ve got the wrong sacrifice in verse 27. Still clinging to the temple stones and goats, are we?

And as for your interpretation of Daniel 8, 11, and 12? Antiochus Epiphanes again? Of course. I figured. The same recycled tradition that refuses to see the broader prophetic fulfillment in Christ and His body. You're not just missing a piece of the puzzle—you’re working from the wrong box altogether, using with history book for fulfillment instead of biblical history!

But hey, keep holding on to that doctrine if you must.... just don’t confuse it with the truth.

So yeah, YOU are done as far as I am concerned.

Oh, so God made an oops? God. who is omniscient knew that Israel could not obey Him however, God, Himself will accomplish what they can`t do just as He has for us.

And BTW I`m looking to see the greatest army that ever was or will be come down to the Golan Heights in late January. There you can have a field day with that, if it doesn`t happen. (Joel 2: 1 & 2)

 

[TribulationSigns]

Oh, so God made an oops? God. who is omniscient knew that Israel could not obey Him however, God, Himself will accomplish what they can`t do just as He has for us.

And BTW I`m looking to see the greatest army that ever was or will be come down to the Golan Heights in late January. There you can have a field day with that, if it doesn`t happen. (Joel 2: 1 & 2)

Golan Heights? Don't you mean the mount of Megiddo? :) The question is, do you understand what the Lord talked about here?

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Whatever.

LOL. Typical of you to not care if what you say is accurate or not. You just believe whatever you want to believe. Who cares if you're right or not? Not you. All you can say is "Whatever".

All Amillennialists are scripture re-writers,

LOL. All you have to offer anymore are false accusations.

because taking Revelation 20:4-6 out of the passage would make no difference to what is being said about the binding of Satan in order that he cannot deceive the nations until the thousand years are over, but without Revelation 20:4 no one would know when that thousand years will commence.

You interpret Revelation 20:4-6 in isolation from the rest of scripture. Look at what is written in Revelation 20:6. Other scripture explicitly teaches that Jesus began reigning after His resurrection (Matt 28:18, Eph 1:19-23, Rev 1:5-6, Col 1:12-13). Does that matter to you? No. You just say "Whatever" to that. Other scripture describes His followers as being made priests long ago (1 Peter 2:9, Rev 1:5-6). Does that matter to you? No. You just say "Whatever" to that. Other scripture says Christ's resurrection was the first resurrection (Acts 26:23, 1 Cor 15:20). Does that matter to you? No. You just say "Whatever" to that. Well, I say "Whatever" to Premill because it's a false doctrine that can't hold up to scrutiny.

Unfortunately for scripture deniers, Revelation 20:4 indicates that the thousand years will not commence before the beast Revelation 13 and 17 and 19 talks about, has ascended from out of the abyss, and this is besides all the other scriptures which indicate Satan has not yet been bound.

You don't even know what the beast represents, so how can you comment on anything related to the beast? In relation to the seven heads of the beast, John indicated that they represent seven kingdoms and kings. John wrote "five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space" (Rev 17:10). If the beast was completely incapacitated in the abyss at the time he wrote the book, how could he say that one of the seven heads or kings (kingdoms) "is" at the time? That wouldn't make sense if the beast was completely incapacitated. You're not recognizing that the beast, the locusts and the dragon (Satan) being bound in the abyss symbolically represents restraint on their activities and a decrease in their power and influence rather than them being completely incapacitated.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Oh, so God made an oops? God. who is omniscient knew that Israel could not obey Him however, God, Himself will accomplish what they can`t do just as He has for us.

When you say "us", who are you referring to exactly and what do you think God hasn't done for Israel that He has done for "us"?