You have been completely equivocal brakelite, NOT upfront. Couching your replies in the vernacular of the doctrine doesn't make anything CLEAR, and the issue is NOT the wording of the doctrine, but who the Bible shows us that Jesus IS. I have no problem understanding what the scripture says about the Son, and have given you tons of scripture to show that as such. The Son was/is the WORD made flesh. John 1 shows everything clearly about the WORD, and how He became flesh/incarnate in Jesus. There is nothing to reconcile seeing as you don't point out what you consider to be wrong with that. Do you accept everything in John 1?
Do you accept verses 1, 14, & 18? A simple direct question that only requires a one word answer.
I have no idea, but they WILL, if I decide this threads needs to be addressed. I was attracted by your support of Arius and your fallacious assertion that there were no writings from him because the RCC destroyed them all. You were answered directly by me brakelite, Jesus is the literal son, ONLY BEGOTTEN, of God, conceived by the Holy Spirit, just as scriptures says. IF you believe that, then why ask? That YOU personally fail to comprehend the mystery of the Godhead, would be nothing new, as since Arius, many have not understood. Jesus may be used in metaphorical sense throughout scripture, with such descriptions as LIGHT, ROCK, and BREAD, but that doesn't contradict WHO He actually is.
Then two are NOT mutually exclusive as you would TRY to make us believe brakelite, in fact they are synonymous with one another, as Is 9:6 prophesied. The choice is to believe God's word, or not, not equivocate about it and try to back away from your intentions. The only one who needs to MAN UP, would be you, IF you are a man?
If I was dishonest I would not have warned you, so convince me you are NOT anti-Trinitarian.