Joe Biden, Anarchy, Lawlessness, Racist, lover of Communism, and hating Christianity
- Thread starter Candidus
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Joe McCarthy would be proud; Trevor didn't find any communists, but he found some people who knew communists, or at least knew people who knew people who were communists.
And yes, House members are subject to background checks if the have access to classified information.
House and Senate staff members with a need to access classified information are required to obtain security clearances. The Office of Senate Security and Office of House Security, respectively, have oversight over the security clearance process for congressional staffers, and background investigations are conducted by the FBI.
Do Members of Congress Have Security Clearances?
Trevor seems to be rather uninformed, although that's not a disqualification for a "communist hunter."
Could Biden’s deep Israel ties ease Obama-era tensions?
With long history of support for Jewish state, experts say that if elected US president, Democrat would be embraced by Israel’s political and military class
During Joe Biden’s first trip to Israel in 1973, he met prime minister Golda Meir, who chain-smoked as she detailed regional security threats days before the Yom Kippur War. Biden, a newly elected senator at the time, later described that meeting as “one of the most consequential” of his life. In the more than four decades since, his career has been punctuated by a staunch defense of Israel, especially in its handling of the Palestinian conflict.
...
But some experts say a Biden win would be welcomed across Israel’s political and military establishment — not just by Netanyahu’s rivals on the left.
Biden has long been a vocal supporter of the Jewish state, saying in a 2015 speech that the US must uphold its “sacred promise to protect the homeland of the Jewish people.”
Such a history of defending Israel is key to winning the trust of Israeli leaders, perpetually sensitive to international criticism.
“We like people who love us,” said Nadav Tamir, a past diplomat and foreign policy advisor to former Israeli president Shimon Peres.
“There is no doubt Biden is a friend who has very strong emotions for Israel,” he told AFP.
Could Biden’s deep Israel ties ease Obama-era tensions?
With long history of support for Jewish state, experts say that if elected US president, Democrat would be embraced by Israel’s political and military class
During Joe Biden’s first trip to Israel in 1973, he met prime minister Golda Meir, who chain-smoked as she detailed regional security threats days before the Yom Kippur War. Biden, a newly elected senator at the time, later described that meeting as “one of the most consequential” of his life. In the more than four decades since, his career has been punctuated by a staunch defense of Israel, especially in its handling of the Palestinian conflict.
...
But some experts say a Biden win would be welcomed across Israel’s political and military establishment — not just by Netanyahu’s rivals on the left.
Biden has long been a vocal supporter of the Jewish state, saying in a 2015 speech that the US must uphold its “sacred promise to protect the homeland of the Jewish people.”
Such a history of defending Israel is key to winning the trust of Israeli leaders, perpetually sensitive to international criticism.
“We like people who love us,” said Nadav Tamir, a past diplomat and foreign policy advisor to former Israeli president Shimon Peres.
“There is no doubt Biden is a friend who has very strong emotions for Israel,” he told AFP.
Could Biden’s deep Israel ties ease Obama-era tensions?
Republicans are still milling around in panic over Harris:
On Wednesday morning, Matt Schlapp, the chairman of the American Conservative Union and a loyal ally to President Donald Trump, joined the pile-on of Republican attacks against Kamala Harris on Twitter, saying she “was a lock em up and throw away the key prosecutor.”
Hours later, Vice President Mike Pence offered a contradictory critique in a fundraising email by labeling Harris “weak on crime.”
The early conflicting messages on Joe Biden’s newly minted and historic running mate reveal the latest strategic challenge for Trump’s struggling re-election campaign: Whether to cast Harris in traditional GOP terms as a “radical liberal” or attempt to open up a wedge between progressives over her checkered record as a prosecutor in California.
A day after Harris’ selection, Republicans are struggling with a unified approach — much as they have wavered in settling on a single line of attack against Biden himself.
“Biden’s record on crime bills and Harris’ record as a prosecutor could depress some Democratic turnout,” said Alex Conant, a Republican consultant who worked on Marco Rubio’s 2016 presidential campaign. “However, if Trump pushes that too far, it undermines the broader narrative that the campaign is trying to establish that they are too liberal and outside the mainstream. You would have to do it in a very targeted way, which is challenging.”
At least for the moment, Trump and his allies appear to be attempting the all-the-above approach, decrying Harris as radically liberal, a “phony” without core beliefs, a critic of Biden’s record on race and an adversary of Black Americans, depending on who is doing the talking.
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article244911512.html
On Wednesday morning, Matt Schlapp, the chairman of the American Conservative Union and a loyal ally to President Donald Trump, joined the pile-on of Republican attacks against Kamala Harris on Twitter, saying she “was a lock em up and throw away the key prosecutor.”
Hours later, Vice President Mike Pence offered a contradictory critique in a fundraising email by labeling Harris “weak on crime.”
The early conflicting messages on Joe Biden’s newly minted and historic running mate reveal the latest strategic challenge for Trump’s struggling re-election campaign: Whether to cast Harris in traditional GOP terms as a “radical liberal” or attempt to open up a wedge between progressives over her checkered record as a prosecutor in California.
A day after Harris’ selection, Republicans are struggling with a unified approach — much as they have wavered in settling on a single line of attack against Biden himself.
“Biden’s record on crime bills and Harris’ record as a prosecutor could depress some Democratic turnout,” said Alex Conant, a Republican consultant who worked on Marco Rubio’s 2016 presidential campaign. “However, if Trump pushes that too far, it undermines the broader narrative that the campaign is trying to establish that they are too liberal and outside the mainstream. You would have to do it in a very targeted way, which is challenging.”
At least for the moment, Trump and his allies appear to be attempting the all-the-above approach, decrying Harris as radically liberal, a “phony” without core beliefs, a critic of Biden’s record on race and an adversary of Black Americans, depending on who is doing the talking.
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article244911512.html
Kamala Harris: Joe Biden’s Vice-Presidential Pick Is No Moderate | National Review
Op-Ed: Democrats favor immigration, which is why they should stop stumping for open borders
California Sen. Kamala Harris has compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the Ku Klux Klan, called on Senate Democrats to resist funding any measure or resource on the border that functions to apprehend and detain illegal border crossers, and made protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients among her top issues.
Yet, she is "for" and "against" Open Borders at the same time!
Kamala Harris swipes at Beto O'Rourke, far-left Dems, says 'We can't have open borders'
We have to have borders, but should welcome all who come in, and we should not have Border Patrols because they are the "KKK."
In her first speech on the Senate floor, Harris declared, “An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.” She later avowed the belief that illegal immigration is “a civil violation, not a crime.” But entering the country illegally has criminal penalties, and reentry without permission after deportation is a crime — as is, in most cases, working in the US without legal residency, since it almost always involves some falsification of documents or lying on work forms.
In April 2018, Harris urged the Senate Appropriations Committee to “reduce funding for beds in the federal immigration system,” reject calls to hire more Border Patrol personnel and “reduce funding for the administration’s reckless immigration enforcement operations.”
https://nypost.com/2019/01/16/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-kamala-harris/
“Raise your hand if you think it should be a civil offense, rather than a crime, to cross the border without documentation.”
The proposal met with wide approval. Eight of the 10 candidates on stage raised their hands, including three who appeared to go on record backing the idea for the first time: Sens. Kamala Harris (Calif.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), as well as former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper. U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.) had previously told The Washington Post he would only favor decriminalizing unauthorized border crossings as part of a compromise to get comprehensive immigration reform passed, but he joined the majority on stage.
Harris is without a doubt an ambitious Politician that will do or say anything to get elected. First, she accuses Joe Biden of being a Racist and a Sexual Abuser of women, and now he is her best friend and says he is a great guy! There is little to no difference between defunding or hindering Border Patrol from doing their job than saying "Open Borders." There is virtually no air between decriminalizing illegal border crossings and being for "Open Borders." Saying that criminals are not criminals is saying that she believes in "Open Borders."
She has learned from the best! In her Clintonesque fashion, she can be for and against everything! No, Bill didn't have sex with that woman... (only oral sex)! Sometimes you just have to listen to see what politicians do, and not what they say, to know what their positions really are!
Op-Ed: Democrats favor immigration, which is why they should stop stumping for open borders
California Sen. Kamala Harris has compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the Ku Klux Klan, called on Senate Democrats to resist funding any measure or resource on the border that functions to apprehend and detain illegal border crossers, and made protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients among her top issues.
Yet, she is "for" and "against" Open Borders at the same time!
Kamala Harris swipes at Beto O'Rourke, far-left Dems, says 'We can't have open borders'
We have to have borders, but should welcome all who come in, and we should not have Border Patrols because they are the "KKK."
In her first speech on the Senate floor, Harris declared, “An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.” She later avowed the belief that illegal immigration is “a civil violation, not a crime.” But entering the country illegally has criminal penalties, and reentry without permission after deportation is a crime — as is, in most cases, working in the US without legal residency, since it almost always involves some falsification of documents or lying on work forms.
In April 2018, Harris urged the Senate Appropriations Committee to “reduce funding for beds in the federal immigration system,” reject calls to hire more Border Patrol personnel and “reduce funding for the administration’s reckless immigration enforcement operations.”
https://nypost.com/2019/01/16/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-kamala-harris/
“Raise your hand if you think it should be a civil offense, rather than a crime, to cross the border without documentation.”
The proposal met with wide approval. Eight of the 10 candidates on stage raised their hands, including three who appeared to go on record backing the idea for the first time: Sens. Kamala Harris (Calif.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), as well as former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper. U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.) had previously told The Washington Post he would only favor decriminalizing unauthorized border crossings as part of a compromise to get comprehensive immigration reform passed, but he joined the majority on stage.
Harris is without a doubt an ambitious Politician that will do or say anything to get elected. First, she accuses Joe Biden of being a Racist and a Sexual Abuser of women, and now he is her best friend and says he is a great guy! There is little to no difference between defunding or hindering Border Patrol from doing their job than saying "Open Borders." There is virtually no air between decriminalizing illegal border crossings and being for "Open Borders." Saying that criminals are not criminals is saying that she believes in "Open Borders."
She has learned from the best! In her Clintonesque fashion, she can be for and against everything! No, Bill didn't have sex with that woman... (only oral sex)! Sometimes you just have to listen to see what politicians do, and not what they say, to know what their positions really are!
So let's recap.
O.K. so that accusation is a lie. Let's move on...
- Your source doesn't have an statement or move by Harris in favor of open borders, but it does quote her as opposing open borders.
- You admitted she wants to make illegal entry a civil offense, which is the opposite of wanting open borders.
- From this, you conclude she is for open borders.
O.K. so that accusation is a lie. Let's move on...
Let's see about the "defunding the police":
The senator went on to explain that “in many cities in America, over one-third of their city budget goes to police.” She asked, “What about the money going to social services? What about the money going to helping people with job training? What about helping with mental health issues that communities are being plagued with, for which we’re putting no resources?”
“Senator, I hear you loud and clear, and I don’t think there's any rational American right now that doesn’t think we need to take a cold, hard look at reforming our police,” McCain replied. But she still wanted a yes or no answer on one question: “Are you for defunding the police?”
“How are you defining ‘defund the police?’” Harris shot back.
“Well, I’m not for anything remotely for that,” McCain replied, seeming to jumble her words a bit. “I assume, and again, this is something that is new to me, I assume it’s removing police.” She went on to quote her nemesis Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and repeated a talking point about how it would be a “privilege” to call the police if someone broke into her home.
After Harris once again explained that “defund the police” means a reimagining of “how we are achieving public safety in America,” Sunny Hostin was forced to jump in to make it even simpler for her co-host.
“Just to add to the conversation, defunding the police doesn’t mean abolishing the police,” Hostin said plainly. “It means taking some of those funds that are typically one-third of the budget of a city and giving some of those funds to services like education and mental health resources.”
Kamala Harris Schools Meghan McCain on ‘Defund the Police’
So Harris isn't supporting "defunding the police", if you mean take away the police from a city. She seems to think it's a good idea to have police do what they do best, and make sure that we don't ask them to do social services work, like dealing with the mentally ill. As you have seen, using people accustomed to handling criminals to do such work, usually goes very badly.
The senator went on to explain that “in many cities in America, over one-third of their city budget goes to police.” She asked, “What about the money going to social services? What about the money going to helping people with job training? What about helping with mental health issues that communities are being plagued with, for which we’re putting no resources?”
“Senator, I hear you loud and clear, and I don’t think there's any rational American right now that doesn’t think we need to take a cold, hard look at reforming our police,” McCain replied. But she still wanted a yes or no answer on one question: “Are you for defunding the police?”
“How are you defining ‘defund the police?’” Harris shot back.
“Well, I’m not for anything remotely for that,” McCain replied, seeming to jumble her words a bit. “I assume, and again, this is something that is new to me, I assume it’s removing police.” She went on to quote her nemesis Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and repeated a talking point about how it would be a “privilege” to call the police if someone broke into her home.
After Harris once again explained that “defund the police” means a reimagining of “how we are achieving public safety in America,” Sunny Hostin was forced to jump in to make it even simpler for her co-host.
“Just to add to the conversation, defunding the police doesn’t mean abolishing the police,” Hostin said plainly. “It means taking some of those funds that are typically one-third of the budget of a city and giving some of those funds to services like education and mental health resources.”
Kamala Harris Schools Meghan McCain on ‘Defund the Police’
So Harris isn't supporting "defunding the police", if you mean take away the police from a city. She seems to think it's a good idea to have police do what they do best, and make sure that we don't ask them to do social services work, like dealing with the mentally ill. As you have seen, using people accustomed to handling criminals to do such work, usually goes very badly.
Harris has spoken for single-payer health insurance, which would cause a huge loss of business for health-care insurers. And thereby, billions of dollars would be diverted from insurance companies to health care providers.
The obvious danger is that the providers might keep most of the savings for themselves, once the middleman was removed.
The obvious danger is that the providers might keep most of the savings for themselves, once the middleman was removed.
If you make murder the equivalent of a parking ticket, then you may be pro-murder!
bukka
Well-Known Member
If it's good situation ethics to win at all costs politically supporting an anti-christ such as Trump, why are you so hard about mothers aborting their babies because of their family situation? If you reject the abortionists situation ethics, shall not others reject your situation ethics in support of an anti-christ, Donald Trump?
If you equate illegal border crossings with murder, then we've found one big problem. But logically, Harris calling for an act to be illegal and punishable, is the opposite of advocating that act. We all know that; no point in denying it.
They lied to you, and they fooled you, because you didn't check to see if they were telling you the truth. Next time, don't be so gullible.
Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
The list of bad things associated with Kamala Harris goes on and on.
If it is a political topic, she is on the wrong side to the extreme.
If it is a religious topic, Satan is patting her on the back saying good job.
There is no rightness or goodness in her.
And I wonder, she has that, I am a girl now, but I use to be guy look going on. Look at those shoulders, she probably played football in collage.
If it is a political topic, she is on the wrong side to the extreme.
If it is a religious topic, Satan is patting her on the back saying good job.
There is no rightness or goodness in her.
And I wonder, she has that, I am a girl now, but I use to be guy look going on. Look at those shoulders, she probably played football in collage.
Last edited:
Similar threads
