You forgot to show that they were actually BLM members, not just provocateurs who showed up to disrupt what you admitted was a:
Why not just admit that you don't have any such evidence?
... if some people commit crimes at what you admitted was a peaceful BLM protest, you are wrong to assume they are BLM members. As you just learned, many people have tried to infiltrate BLM protests and riot to blame BLM. Would you like me to show you again?
Why not just admit that you don't have any such evidence?
Oh, good grief. So, what you are actually saying is that...
... if some people commit crimes at what you admitted was a peaceful BLM protest, you are wrong to assume they are BLM members. As you just learned, many people have tried to infiltrate BLM protests and riot to blame BLM. Would you like me to show you again?