Purity said:
Recently on another forum I was involved in a debate concerning "supernatural doctrines" on such matters which the Bible remains totally silent (purgatory - infant baptism etc etc).
I was amazed at how resilient Catholics are in the face of such overwhelming Bible evidence. I mean some doctrines are very easily refuted while others need greater time to develop. Needless to say the old saying "give a child to a catholic priest for 7 years and they will always be catholic" has proven true in my experience.
But when one comes out of the great harlot its a mighty work to behold.
Purity
Who is the great harlot in your analogy?
Moreover, even though the Bible is, put in its proper place, only a part of the full revelation of God, much of what some say is unbiblical is simply a case of not seeing it in the Bible. The epistles talk about entire families being baptized with no regard to age, understanding, or an "age of accountability". To say that forgiveness and redemption always involves an act of conscience volition on the part of the sinner is simplistic because sins can also be forgiven in an act of absolution even before the sinner recognizes their need for it. One example of this is when a paralyzed man is lowered through a roof to Jesus and Jesus tells the man, "You're sins are forgiven." Another is when Jesus tells the apostles, "you are clean because of the word I have spoken to you."
Salvation often means God saving us even in our ignorance, but once we become aware, we are called to walk in it. So a baptized infant makes his baptism invalid when he willingly departs from the faith as an adult. At some point, a willing decision is made, but not necessarily before the action that saves a person. The paralyzed man would need to walk in the newness of life he was given when Jesus forgave his sins, by the same token.