Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The Harlot of Babylon is Nero or the Roman Empire. John predicted the fall of the Roman Empire and it did fall.Suhar said:[SIZE=medium]Let’s open a whole new can of worms! Which part of Revelation 17-18 does not fit USA? We do not kill saints? But we do kill tens of millions of unborn that are saints since they did not even get to be born.[/SIZE]
I should start new topic on this.
[SIZE=medium].[/SIZE]
True, I meet one who when pressed to provide Scripture support would say, "The Church is the final authourity on such matters I will trust in her over the Word of God".Selene said:Not all Catholics end with "It's a great mystery". Also, our doctrines are not easily refuted. If you want to know the answers to your questions, it's always best to go to a Catholic apologist.
I pick the very first one......Trinity. <_< We believe that there is three persons in one God and that Jesus is the Second Person in the Holy Trinity. Before I even begin, I would like to ask you this question. Do you believe that Jesus is God?Purity said:True, I meet one who when pressed to provide Scripture support would say, "The Church is the final authourity on such matters I will trust in her over the Word of God".
This is worse than the one who claims a mystery as they have departed from the Holy Word to the doctrines of men.
Here is a list of erroneous teachings...take your pick
1. TRINITY
Purity said:Well the Great Harlot is identified in Rev 17.
That doesn't answer the question.
A more appropriate question for you to ask would be "if Roman Catholicism is the Mother Harlot who then are her daughters?
Ok, Ellen G. White, so the Roman Catholic Church is the harlot? Do you understand that John was writing to an audience who would witness the things he wrote about? Even from the very first verse, it's made clear that Revelation was written about events soon to come to pass. The harlot John spoke of has no contemporary application whatsoever.
Firstly has not Rome always claimed to be the Mother Church? And does she not see Christianity as being her disobedient daughters?
The Church has always taken on a motherly responsibility. You separate the Church from Christianity out of a bent to cast aspersions on the Catholic Church. But the church cannot be separated from Christianity. They're one and the same.
During the Tridentine council the papacy described itself as being a "Roman Church" and "The Mother and Mistress of all churches". Now if we went back in history could we not prove also that her daughters were bought forth by her adulterous unions with the "kings of the earth"?
What crap is this?
Is not the establishment of the church of England a case in point?
The church of England has nothing to do with the Catholic Church. The See of Canterbury is not in communion with the See of Rome, and they are furthermore cut off from apostolic succession. Anglicans were the first to call themselves "Protestants".
Was it not originally Roman in origin?
No
Surely I am not sharing history which is unknown to you?
I'm sure you are
Rome refused the request of King Henry VIII for a divorce, he set up the Church of England as distinct from that of Rome, and refused to acknowledge the authority of the Pope. All State Protestant Churches teach the basic doctrines of Rome in greater or lesser degree; whilst many of the ceremonies and beliefs of the mother church can be traced back to pagan Babylon.
Many Protestant ceremonies and beliefs can also be traced back to pagan precedents. It's a game you bigots play, but other bigots who hate all Christians as much as you hate Catholics play the same game, tying all Christian traditions to pagan antiquity using specious, convoluted, and unsubstantiated associations. It's a game and you can't see through it because you're caught up in it.
So one does not question RCC as being the Mother of Harlots the question now must be asked "who are her daughters"
Unless you have another interpretation of Rev 17?
This prophesy as well as many that describe Rome are in reference to pre-Christian Rome. The leaders were framed in coded references that John expected his immediate audience to understand and decipher. To think that John was writing to a 21st century audience, providing you ammunition to revile and spew hatred at those you don't like, is beyond conceited. It hazards the shoals of the same mental illness that possessed the SDA foundress.
Please provide the Scripture where a young child is being sprinkled?
Please provide the Scripture where the Bible is the sole rule of faith all church ecclesial practices are governed by it.
It's no use trying to reason with Seventh Day Adventists. Even among Protestants their bitter, acrimonious rantings cannot be stomached.Selene said:I pick the very first one......Trinity. <_< We believe that there is three persons in one God and that Jesus is the Second Person in the Holy Trinity. Before I even begin, I would like to ask you this question. Do you believe that Jesus is God?
New topic started.Selene said:The Harlot of Babylon is Nero or the Roman Empire. John predicted the fall of the Roman Empire and it did fall.
Ah you go for the low hanging fruit...I pick the very first one......Trinity. <_< We believe that there is three persons in one God and that Jesus is the Second Person in the Holy Trinity. Before I even begin, I would like to ask you this question. Do you believe that Jesus is God?
Have ye not read Matt 5:43I thought this thread was about loving muslims. h34r:
How will praying to God who is soon to send his son to admonish the Christian systems of the earth help in your cause? Christianity will have it AD70...you will see.Well, anti-catholic ideas are actually part of SDA theology, so what can you do, but pray for them?
Tears.Ok, Ellen G. White, so the Roman Catholic Church is the harlot? Do you understand that John was writing to an audience who would witness the things he wrote about? Even from the very first verse, it's made clear that Revelation was written about events soon to come to pass. The harlot John spoke of has no contemporary application whatsoever.
Nice.What crap is this?
Where have I said I hate Christians?Many Protestant ceremonies and beliefs can also be traced back to pagan precedents. It's a game you bigots play, but other bigots who hate all Christians as much as you hate Catholics play the same game, tying all Christian traditions to pagan antiquity using specious, convoluted, and unsubstantiated associations. It's a game and you can't see through it because you're caught up in it.
The irony here - you can use Rome and Christian in the same context...wow!This prophesy as well as many that describe Rome are in reference to pre-Christian Rome.
So you believe Catholicism is only founded in the 21st century? For an advocate of Catholicism you do not know your history very well.The leaders were framed in coded references that John expected his immediate audience to understand and decipher. To think that John was writing to a 21st century audience, providing you ammunition to revile and spew hatred at those you don't like, is beyond conceited. It hazards the shoals of the same mental illness that possessed the SDA foundress.
There it is everyone.Please provide the Scripture where the Bible is the sole rule of faith all church ecclesial practices are governed by it.
Among the Christians of John's time, Babylon was the code name for "Rome." Fornication with the kings refers to the pagan nations. Rome was a pagan nation who forced others to worship pagan gods. They drank from the blood of the martyrs......Rome killed many Christians in her arenas, and it was done for their entertainment. The Great Harlot was Nero or the Roman Empire at that time. And both Nero and the Roman Empire fell. This was what John predicted, and this prophecy came true.Suhar said:New topic started.
In the days of Roman Empire few continents were not discovered. How could Roman Empire fornicate with kings they did not know existed?
Plus, fall of Roman empire was a very slow process that took decades. Clearly not the case with harlot of Babylon.
Sometimes threads drift. Sometimes they pivot.Pelaides said:I thought this thread was about loving muslims. h34r:
And it "became" Christian....State and Religion came together and its name is the "Holy Roman Catholic Church"Among the Christians of John's time, Babylon was the code name for "Rome." Fornication with the kings refers to the pagan nations. Rome was a pagan nation who forced others to worship pagan gods. They drank from the blood of the martyrs......Rome killed many Christians in her arenas, and it was done for their entertainment. The Great Harlot was Nero or the Roman Empire at that time. And both Nero and the Roman Empire fell. This was what John predicted, and this prophecy came true.
You ignored both of my points so if you want to talk to yourself I am not going to get in the way.Selene said:Among the Christians of John's time, Babylon was the code name for "Rome." Fornication with the kings refers to the pagan nations. Rome was a pagan nation who forced others to worship pagan gods. They drank from the blood of the martyrs......Rome killed many Christians in her arenas, and it was done for their entertainment. The Great Harlot was Nero or the Roman Empire at that time. And both Nero and the Roman Empire fell. This was what John predicted, and this prophecy came true.
I didn't ignore it. The word "Babylon" during John's time meant "Rome." And the kings whom Rome fornicated with were the pagan nations. Even history can testify to this. When pagan Rome conquered Greece, for example, they adopted the Greek gods into their culture. The only difference is the names were changed. The Roman god Jupiter is the same as the Greek god Zeus.Suhar said:You ignored both of my points so if you want to talk to yourself I am not going to get in the way.
Many places where cutures and languages mixed were called "Babulon".
And then you ignore them again.Selene said:I didn't ignore it.
Suhar, you only want to make it look like the "United States" is the harlot of Babylon. But the United States didn't even exist at that time. Babylon was known as "Rome" during John's time, and that is the truth. You are ignoring the truth.Suhar said:And then you ignore them again.
Have fun talking to yourself.
My brother, there are many prophecies in the Holy Bible, and some of them have already come true. To John, the Fall of the Roman Empire was the future..........but for us, it has already happened.Suhar said:All nations of the world drank wine of wrath of her fornication. In the days of Rome many nations, continents did not know Rome even existed. Rev 18.3
US did not exist? It is called prophesy. I is foretelling things that did not happen yet.
The word "all" doesn't mean every single nation on earth. It is referring only to the pagan nations known at that time. For example, look at this biblical verse:Suhar said:http://biblehub.com/revelation/18-3.htm
All nations. By saying Rome you throw "all" out.
You know what happens to people that throw words out of Word of God?