Mary as New Eve

[GracePeace]

All YOU'VE done is issue denial after denial,

I stood on Scripture, your side failed to produce a reason for rejecting God.

accuse me of non-existent "name-calling"

Well, stop namecalling.

and run to the Mods whenever you get stuck stumped.

Self-control is a fruit of the Spirit--control yourself so that the mods don't have to.

As I states earlier - perhaps a Debate site os NOT the best place for you so be spending your time if it upsets you so much.

You're no threat to me.

 

[GracePeace]

I wonder what will happen on the day he realizes that Protestants are merely protesting Catholics?

Sorry, weren't you literally just arguing against God's condemnation on homosexuality yesterday ? Who are you to speak on this?

 

[Waiting on him]

Read Ephesians 5.

Define the word holistic.

 

[Waiting on him]

Sorry, weren't you literally just arguing against God's condemnation on homosexuality yesterday ? Who are you to speak on this?

No, I made clear what my argument was, apparently to no avail,,,,,, because your still putting forth the finger and making vain accusations.

 

[GracePeace]

Define the word holistic.

Um, dude, you were just arguing against God's condemnation of homosexuality yesterday--you're not qualified to engage in this discussion.

 

[GracePeace]

No, I made clear what my argument was, apparently to no avail,,,,,, because your still putting forth the finger and making vain accusations.

OK You're about to get put on block.

 

[Waiting on him]

OK You're about to get put on block.

That truly would be a shame, I may have something to share?

 

[GracePeace]

That truly would be a shame, I may have something to share?

Not in this discussion you don't.

 

[GracePeace]

That truly would be a shame, I may have something to share?

What I mean is you don't have the most basic principles down--God's condemnation of homosexuality is literally not even the Gospel. It precedes the Gospel. This discussion we're having is far far beyond that. I am not going to get involved in a discussion where you are way in over your head. That's not fair to me or to you.

 

[Waiting on him]

Not in this discussion you don't.

Will please let me post on this public forum? I promise civility, no punching below the belt, no eye poking etc..etc.

 

[Waiting on him]

What I mean is you don't have the most basic principles down--God's condemnation of homosexuality is literally not even the Gospel. It precedes the Gospel. This discussion we're having is far far beyond that. I am not going to get involved in a discussion where you are way in over your head. That's not fair to me or to you.

Get back on topic.

 

[GracePeace]

Get back on topic.

You have nothing to add to this discussion.

 

[Waiting on him]

First order of buisiness. Discover who is the bridegroom can’t have a bride without a bridegroom.

 

[GracePeace]

@James the Rabbit had the following important objection "I accept that the Church is the New Eve--but Mary is also a part of the Church, so she could qualify as 'New Eve' as well."

The answer is as follows (for anyone who missed it) : Mary was not a part of the Church (sharing in Christ's death ("I am crucified with Christ") and resurrection, nor "in Christ" ("for the Spirit had not yet been given" John 7:7--"But the one who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit with Him." 1 Corinthians 6:17), which wasn't even in existence at the time in which this objection wants to insist she was "New Eve" (ie, when she became pregnant, then bore and gave birth to Jesus) any more than Paul was a part of the Church when he was persecuting the Church to death.

 

[Waiting on him]

@James the Rabbit had the following important objection "I accept that the Church is the New Eve--but Mary is also a part of the Church, so she could qualify as 'New Eve' as well."

The answer is as follows (for anyone who missed it) : Mary was not a part of the Church (sharing in His death ("I am crucified with Christ") and resurrection, "in Christ" ("for the Spirit had not yet been given"--"he who is one with the Lord is one Spirit"), which wasn't even in existence at the time in which this objection wants to insist she was "New Eve" (ie, when she became pregnant, then bore and gave birth to Jesus) any more than Paul was a part of the Church when he was persecuting the Church to death.

I’m trying to catch up, this is under the assumption that you are the bride and the bridegroom, is this correct?

 

[Waiting on him]

I love watching you teach. It’s almos better than watching the flint stones.

 

[GracePeace]

I love watching you teach. It’s almos better than watching the flint stones.

When I'm at dialysis, the hours fly by like minutes. It's amazing. So much fun. Nothing better to do with your life.

 

[Waiting on him]

When I'm at dialysis, the hours fly by like minutes. It's amazing. So much fun. Nothing better to do with your life.

Will you allow me to make an observation here on your forum?

 

[GracePeace]

Will you allow me to make an observation here on your forum?

This is my thread, but not my forum, but go ahead (briefly please).

 

[Waiting on him]

John 3:27-29 KJV
[27] John answered and said, A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven. [28] Ye yourselves bear me witness, that I said, I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before him. [29] He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.