It's more the matter of bounderies and personalities.Because you had NO valid response then - and you have NO valid response now . . .
Bye now!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It's more the matter of bounderies and personalities.Because you had NO valid response then - and you have NO valid response now . . .
Paul and the Early Church debated vigorously to spread the truth.It's more the matter of bounderies and personalities.
Bye now!
They didn't debate, they told the truth, and brushed the dust off their sandals at whoever wouldn't hear it. Acts 13:46 -Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.Paul and the Early Church debated vigorously to spread the truth.
However, if you've got nothing to say - I'll respect that.
i would not , if i were you , heed a word one outta that mans lips .Wow! Just, Wow!
they did debate TO SPREAD what . THE TRUTH .Paul and the Early Church debated vigorously to spread the truth.
However, if you've got nothing to say - I'll respect that.
they TOLD the TRUTH . thus they darn sure preached the absolute dire necessity to BELEIVE ON JESUSThey didn't debate, they told the truth, and brushed the dust off their sandals at whoever wouldn't hear it. Acts 13:46 -Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.
@amigo de christoi would not , if i were you , heed a word one outta that mans lips .
As for me i shall preach JESUS and the dire need to beleive on HIM and to observe all things HE did teach .
which also means this
BEWARE of those who go ab out in long robes and love flattering titles
I aint sitting under that . And how i suggest none do .

and now a questoin . what was it pual and barnabas , or i should also say WHO was it paul and barnabas went aboutThey didn't debate, they told the truth, and brushed the dust off their sandals at whoever wouldn't hear it. Acts 13:46 -Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.
if a man could be put to death by two or more witnesses under the law .They didn't debate, they told the truth, and brushed the dust off their sandals at whoever wouldn't hear it. Acts 13:46 -Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.
@amigo de christoif a man could be put to death by two or more witnesses under the law .
HOW MUCH SORER a punishment awaits those who ...............................TROD JESUS under foot .
BUT that aint what the ecumeincal harlot and her inclusive father satan says .
Did i ever mention that satan can lie .
OH he can . HE can even come in as though he be god and love . And he darn sure
has convinced even many in christendom HE IS GOD AND LOVE .
and they BELIEVE ITS GOD and LOVE . we gots problems in the building .

@amigo de christoand now a questoin . what was it pual and barnabas , or i should also say WHO was it paul and barnabas went about
preaching the DIRE NEED TO BELIEVE ON . WHY IT WAS JESUS CHRIST .
And now for a reminder .
WHY .
WHY do you think they shook the dust off their feet .
AS A TESTIMONY against them . And it was not for their good but for their destruction .
JESUS has told his own to do this . HE who will not recieve you, shake the dust off you feet as a testimony against them .
IT will be BETTER , BETTER for even sodom on the day of judgment than FOR THEM .
TO REJECT JESUS IS DEADLY .
but that aint what this all inclusvie generation is sayin g . And now ya know what I WARN AGAINST IT SO .

That’s funny – because the Bible tells us that Paul and Barnabas DID debate with unbelievers, philosophers and pagans -They didn't debate, they told the truth,
"Shaking the dust" fromo their sandals was Paul's and Barnabas's LAST resort - not a mid-debate move . . .and brushed the dust off their sandals at whoever wouldn't hear it. Acts 13:46 -Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.
Ughhh - another psychotic anti-Cathollic rant . . .they did debate TO SPREAD what . THE TRUTH .
WELL ecumeincal incluisivisim IS NOT THE TRUTH but a lie . a fat lie meant only
to merge all f alse religoins with all the decieved in christendom .
YEAH , i dont heed false gospels . and the all inclusive eucmeincal one , IS FALSE .
So thanks for the reminder .
OH i pray you hear my reminder as well . God dont , Christ dont , the apostels didnt
NOR SHALL I kiss korans and budda statues and make the cliam that we all children of GOD just coming to GOD
in different ways . what a anti christ lie that one was . sit under that . NEVER .
And NEVER i do mean . choose ye this day whom ye shall serve
whether it be the ecumenical harlot and her all inclusive god satan and her interfaith of anti christ
OR JESUS CHRIST .
BUT IT WONT BE BOTH . choose . but choose wisely . As for me , ITS JESUS .
i dont sit under harlots who desire to center a false religoin of inclusivity and its anti christ abraham peace accords
IN jersualem .
Yes, YOU’D better, indeed . . .WE better choose wisely .
in Lystra (Acts 14)That’s funny – because the Bible tells us that Paul and Barnabas DID debate with unbelievers, philosophers and pagans -
in Lystra (Acts 14)
in Athens (Acts 17)
in Ephesus (Acts 19)
Ummm, maybe YOU should study your Bible . . .
"Shaking the dust" fromo their sandals was Paul's and Barnabas's LAST resort - not a mid-debate move . . .
Can a man judge a woman, or can a woman judge a man?A Catholic diocese is publicly telling families to recognize Mary as “Queen of the Universe,” consecrate themselves to her, and pray to her. On August 22, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence published material for the “Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary.” It says Mary was crowned “Queen,” instructs families to give her an honored place in their homes, pray to her, and consecrate their lives and possessions to her. Another Catholic archdiocese published a defense of Mary's alleged queenship the same day.
Why it matters: This is not a minor denominational custom. Scripture never calls Mary the Queen of Heaven, never commands Christians to consecrate themselves to her, and never tells believers to pray to her. Mary herself said, “My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour” (Luke 1:46-47, KJV). Jesus Christ is the one Mediator: “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5).
Jeremiah's references to the “queen of heaven” certainly do not support this practice. They describe an object of idolatrous worship that provoked God's anger (Jeremiah 7:18; 44:17-25).
Read what the Diocese of Providence published
sounds new age . whats next the divine feminism .Can a man judge a woman, or can a woman judge a man?
If Jesus is to judge humanity, both men and women, then logically, Jesus must embody both masculine and feminine aspects, being outwardly male and inwardly female.
What you hate has become your God of worship. You have put An abomination at sacred space.
This is a history of the early church battles against philosophers.sounds new age . whats next the divine feminism .
++++then women are left without divine guidanceIf Mary is not accepted as the mother of all women, then women are left without divine guidance.
Their offspring will be born in the likeness of an abomination because they worship a detestable thing.