Aunty Jane
Well-Known Member
In the Revelation Jesus identified him as the “original serpent” in Eden. Was he a literal serpent? Were spirit beings capable of materializing as humans? Yes. Did they need God’s permission to manifest themselves in material bodies? Apparently not, because on several occasions angels materialized in human for to bring messages to God's human servants (Like Abraham at Mamre).....no technology back then to communicate in any other way. But “the sons of God” who materialized fleshly bodies in the days of Noah had actually defected because they had sex with human women and produced freakishly gigantic offspring.....these were the ones responsible for the licentiousness and violence at that time......and probably provided the basis for the gods of Greek mythology as well.I have explained this before....
Drawing definitive conclusions from vague metaphoric stories can cause false beliefs.
Never the less, it is human nature.
The talking serpent....do we have a talking serpent in Christianity?
Is Satan a serpent?
God saved the only righteous man of that time by getting him to build a vessel and bringing the flood, which got rid of the Nephilim and forced their errant fathers back to the spirit realm, where he placed them under restraint....they were never said to materialize again. This action though drastic, put God’s purpose back on track.
So if Satan was “the covering cherub” in the garden of Eden, what was to stop him either materializing as a serpent, or even using one as a dupe, like a ventriloquist does a dummy?
It does not say what manifestation satan took when tempting Jesus, but he was able to show him all the kingdoms of the world in an instant of time. Something that today would have been no big deal.When Satan was tempting Christ on the mountain....was that a talking serpent.
No but the adversary was both a resistor and a slanderer.Does the name Satan appear in Genesis?
Why did the Jews need to know this? The true colors of the devil manifested when Jesus was born in Bethlehem. Which started with a plot using Babylonian astrologers as dupes to have Jesus killed whilst he was still an infant.Do the Jews believe that was Satan?
If the Serpent was Satan....did God know that? Why not say it.
Yes...Revelation 12:7-12.Is there a scripture that says the words....and Satan is a devil?
Since “satan” and “devil” are not names but titles describing the person to whom they are assigned, why would God need to identify him? The “adversary” is also a title....someone who is an adversary is an opposer.
Jesus came to add the details that were missing in Jewish understanding....isn’t that why Paul called it a "sacred secret" or "mystery"?Christianity believes things about the Hebrew Bible that are not there.
What are the prophets? Did God give them information? If so, and they knew that Satan was a devil, they would have made that clear...an entity that is the enemy of God and man. Front page news wouldn't you think?
.....the Jews rejected him as a nation, but individual Jews and Gentiles were privileged with that information. 2,000 years later and the Jews still don't get it.
All it takes is an understanding of the word "theos".....both Jehovah and his son are rightly termed "theos" in the Greek meaning and understanding of the word. Remember that their gods were not 'goody two shoes'. So it does not mean in Greek what it meant to the Jews or the early Christians. It was a translation problem.....the Greeks had no word to describe the ONE perfect but nameless God of Israel, so they just threw in the definite article...."ho" meaning the difference between a "divine" or "god-like" one, and "THE God" of the Jews.If the prophets knew that the messiah would be the Son of God...a God, that would fill the prophetic book of the Hebrew Bible. Dancing in the streets and shouting from the mountain tops. Whatever else they had to say....what else would trump that? Fill the prophetic book! Nearly every page. What it would not be, is something that you would have to comb the scriptures to find something that would suggest He would be a God.
Satan means “Resister,” or “Adversary.” “Devil” means “Slanderer,” “Accuser,” or “Maligner.” He became all of these in Eden.The issue is that we know that Satan became a devil and most do not understand why that was not made clear in the Hebrew Bible.
When did the fall of the angels occur? When did Satan became a devil? That is a debate...but it is not going to be resolved from the information in the Hebrew Bible.
Amazingly, satan's real name is never mentioned in the scriptures. God has never allowed it to be revealed. He is only known by his descriptive titles.
When did the angels follow satan in rebellion? Since the angels who materialized in Noah's day were rebels, apparently we can trace their defection at least back to then. Who knows how long they been ogling these beautiful women? Sex was denied to the angels because they are created, not the product of reproduction. It was therefore a grossly unnatural desire for them.
Genesis does.....he became a "resistor" and a "slanderer" right in the beginning.....not rocket science is it?Paul and the rest of the Apostles were Jews...not stupid. They came to know that Satan was a devil...but they did not tell us when the fall occurred or when Satan became a devil.
What am I missing? Should we call in Sherlock Holmes?
This always amuses me....all the fuss over pronunciation when the Jews, out of some kind of superstition, stopped uttering God's name long before Jesus walked the earth, so it was lost. But Jesus said that he had come to make God's name known to his disciples. (John 17:6,11)Nit picking? God's name nit picking? In my beliefs, God's name is important and deserves to be in the Bible. Paul said there was only one name that could be called upon for salvation. A little important. The J slam was part of the effort to remove God's name from the Old and New Testament. The name of God the Father or God the Son is no longer in the Bible. I have a problem with that.
Since believers in the trinity have no problem with the name "Jesus", but balk over the name "Jehovah" which are both English translations of their Hebrew names, how is calling the son of God "Jesus" OK, but not calling the Father "Jehovah"...don't they believe both are the same God?
There is no command anywhere in the Hebrew scriptures to stop saying the divine name out loud. The Bible writers used it freely and reverently.
But from the Tanakh we can see that God wanted his name to be "mentioned" in every generation.....just another incidence where the Jews let him down. They couldn't even maintain his precious name....
Exodus 3:15....Tanakh...
"15 And God said further to Moses, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'The Lord God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is how I should be mentioned in every generation. טווַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ ע֨וֹד אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶל־משֶׁ֗ה כֹּ֣ה תֹאמַר֘ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ יְהֹוָ֞ה אֱלֹהֵ֣י אֲבֹֽתֵיכֶ֗ם אֱלֹהֵ֨י אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִצְחָ֛ק וֵֽאלֹהֵ֥י יַֽעֲקֹ֖ב שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם זֶה־שְּׁמִ֣י לְעֹלָ֔ם וְזֶ֥ה זִכְרִ֖י לְדֹ֥ר"
The "LORD GOD" is Jehovah...Yahweh....יְהֹוָ֞ה