Who was Hebrews 10 spoken to????, answer "BELIEVERS" so that destroys your free will theory right there.
I don't comprehend FREEWILL because it doesn't exist. So there's no point in pushing this false doctrine, without any evidence at all.
This is a great article on this topic. If you have time maybe consider reading it.I find it quite on point.
The Bible Unequivocally Teaches Against Free-Will
(I'm talking about Libertarian Free-Will, which I believe is what most people are talking about when they use the phrase "free-will." I do think the Bible teaches the genuineness of human choice and voluntary actions in a basically compatibilistic framework, but that's not exactly what I want to address here.)
It seems to me there's been a number of posts recently on the subject, including some arguments against theism based on the concept of free-will, assuming that it is a Biblical concept, probably because I think most Christians nowadays would affirm it. Nonetheless, it's clearly just an assumed philosophical concept utterly foreign to the Old and New Testaments. There are numerous things taught by the whole of the Bible that clearly contradict the idea.
There are two primary things which flatly refute the idea that the Bible views humans as fully autonomous beings: (1) the absolute sovereignty of God, and (2) mankind's bondage to sin.
Firstly, the sovereignty of God:
The Bible teaches that God decrees whatsoever comes to pass; that he arranges all things according to his will; that nothing can stay his hand and he will accomplish everything he purposes to do (Isaiah 46:9-11, Dan. 4:35 Prov. 16:4, Psalm 33:10-11, Eph. 1:11, Rom. 8:28, etc.). Hear this: my argument is NOT that the future is fixed and there is no free-will because God foreknows all things and we can't falsify his foreknowledge (though I think that's obviously true as far as it goes). My argument is that he Bible teaches God foreknows everything because he previously
determined all things by his decree, and
that's why humans cannot be autonomous. And make no mistake, the text indicates that God's sovereignty is not limited to non-moral agents. He exercises sovereignty over human choices as well (Gen. 50:20, Prov. 21:1, Acts 2:23, 4:27-28). Human beings are not autonomous - they do not have libertarian free-will - because their choices, actions, thoughts, etc. are all predetermined by the decree of God.
Secondly, bondage to sin:
This mostly comes out in the New Testament, though obviously the same elements are present in the Old. In the New, however, we get the most absolutely clear statements that mankind isn't libertarianly free. (I will concede, however, that this would not be applicable to Adam pre-fall, but the first one covers him as well). Jesus said "everyone who sins is a slave of sin" (John 8:34). That one is pretty self-explanatory: slaves aren't free. Also in John, Jesus gives a clear example of a thing mankind cannot do: "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him" (John 6:44). Contextually, coming to Jesus is synonymous with believing in him. Furthermore, we get more in Paul's letters. Romans 8:7-8, "the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for
it is not even able to do so, and those who are in the flesh cannot please God." 1 Corinthians 2:14, "But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and
he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised." These are clear statements describing entire categories of things that mankind
cannot do without supernatural intervention. In other words, humans are not
freely able to do these things.
So there we go.
Attribution:
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/tkcnzw