aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
-- Anyone who comes down on the wrong end of a UN decision thinks they have overstepped their bounds. That does not automatically make it so.
The question you should then be asking yourself is, did Israel have the right to return to that land that had been legally theirs and illegally taken from them?
If the answer is yes, what better method could have been used than by peaceful means?
Certainly if the people currently on the land are willing to commit genocide to keep Jews away, then there would be no way to negotiate an agreement to placate them.
One should ask why the UN would grant the Israelis land and then not provide protection or assistance when they were attacked.
-- I understand, but 'historical innacuracies' do not trump historical truths when it comes to doing what is right or wrong.
And the historical truth that Palestinians and the surrounding countries have launched multiple wars with the sole purpose of your destruction would more than justify Israel in not being anxious to negotiate with them or take them seriously. Espeically when their stated goal still calls for the complete elimination of the Jewish state.
-- Anyone who comes down on the wrong end of a UN decision thinks they have overstepped their bounds. That does not automatically make it so.
The question you should then be asking yourself is, did Israel have the right to return to that land that had been legally theirs and illegally taken from them?
If the answer is yes, what better method could have been used than by expressed peaceful means?
Certainly if the people currently on the land are willing to commit genocide to keep Jews away, then there would be no way to negotiate an agreement to placate them.
One should ask why the UN would grant the Israelis land and then not provide protection or assistance when they were attacked.
-- The question should be, "Just how flexible should the Jews be expected to be?"
They have encountered three wars where the attacker's expressed purpose was to commit genocide against them.
That same group launched multiple suicide bombings against Israeli civilians and when Israel put up walls to stop them, began launching rockets into civilian centers.
That same group that the world demandsIsrael negotiate with STILL has the expressed goal of the destruction of the Israeli state.
That same group is teaching in schools and on TV programs that Jews are sub-human and deserve death.
Israel has showed their seriousness for peace, even to the point of forcibly removing their own citizens from land to give it to the Palestinians, and they have received nothing in return - except more suicide bombings and rocket attacks.
At just what point do we consider that someone OTHER than Israel needs to show some flexibility.
And I would say that the Israelis weren't so much given a "gift" as given justice:
- The Israelis lived on the land they currently occupy for scores of generations before they were forced off.
- They had established a sovereign nation on that very land twice already in the past and have only lost those nations via aggression.
- Even though the nation of Israel had been wiped off the map twice, a continuous Jewish population/presence has remained uninterrupted on the land.
I have heard people say that wars often decide borders so Israel should accept the fact that they lost the land.
Those are normally the ones who don't want to apply that same axiom to Israel gaining their current land.
I fully admit that my opinions about Israel and the Palestinians are undeveloped. I believe the issue is complicated from a human perspective - we need to rely on God to bring about the correct solution. Have you read The Chosen? Great book - I found myself agreeing with the jewish people who wanted to wait for God to act rather than the Zionists.