The talk is concerned with the nature of God and how to make sense of the Bible's revelation that he creates everything that exists including history. In my studies, I have come to realize that in order to evaluate this information, we need a different set of criteria. As I said in my previous post, it is impossible to evaluate the actions of a transcendent creator with the criteria of our plane of reality. All of your questions in this post suffer from a typical category mistake we often make, attempting to understand the nature of a transcendent creator, given rules and principles common to creatures.
It appears to me that you want to argue with Reformed theology, which is actually poor philosophy as you can tell. The objections you raised in this post and your previous post, get at the philosophical weaknesses of Reformed theology. Nonetheless, Reformed theology, though bad philosophy gives proper attention to those Biblical passages that address the nature of God as the creator. Your objections, though valid critique of Reformed philosophy, are empty with regard to such passages. The Bible teaches divine determinism. Just because Reformers are unable to explain it using rock solid philosophical arguments, doesn't mean God is not a divine determinist. We must be cautious to avoid erasing God's revelation of himself while we are in the process of poking holes in Reformed theology.
Throughout history, God has revealed his nature in stages and steps. For instance, consider Exodus 6:3 where the Lord speaks to Moses about Abraham.
Exodus 6:3
and I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as God Almighty, but by My name, [Yahweh], I did not make Myself known to them.
Names are intended to convey a person's most significant characteristic. Abraham knew the Lord as "God almighty", which means "the strongest and most powerful god known to man." The name "Yahweh", however, conveys the idea that God is not only the strongest most potent god among the pantheon; he is a transcendent being. Earlier in Exodus 3:15, God partly explains the meaning of his name in terms of his eternal nature. "This [name] is my memorial to you from generation to generation", he says.
from NET Bible notes:
In that place God called Moses to this task and explained the significance of the name “Yahweh” by the enigmatic expression “I am that I am.” “I am” (אֶהְיֶה, ʾehyeh) is not a name; “Yahweh” is. But the explanation of the name with this sentence indicates that Yahweh is the one who is always there, and that guarantees the future, for everything he does is consistent with his nature. He is eternal, never changing; he remains. Now, in Exodus 6, the meaning of the name “Yahweh” will be more fully unfolded.
In other words, as each generation of believers comes along, God reveals more about himself and his nature. Abraham knew God by his name "El Shaddai", which means "God almighty", but Moses knew God as "Yawweh" which means "I am that I am" or "He who is" God is not only THE supreme being in our reality, he is THE supreme being in every reality because he is the self-existent creator of everything that exists including history. John 1:3, Hebrews 1:2
In Hebrews 1:2, Paul asserts that God created "the world", but the Greek word is actually "aion", elsewhere translated "age." Paul not only believes that God created the "stuff" of this world, he also created the ages of this world, that is, God orchestrates history.
From this we understand that history not only moves according to a plan, it has a good purpose. But remember, in order to understand and evaluate the transcendent nature of God, we need to use criteria appropriate for that reality. Your objections aren't valid because the rules and logic of God-as-transcendent-being are different than the rules and logic associated with God-as-almighty-God. The strongest god in the pantheon would need to use coercion, force, and armies in order to establish his will. The transcendent God merely speaks things into existence.
What is harder to say, "let there be an individual who believes in my son" or "let there be light"?
For further research, read Jack Crabtree's book "The Most Real Being: a defense of divine determinism."
https://www.amazon.com/Most-Real-Being-Philosophical-Determinism/dp/0974691410